We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
What does Wattson purport to measure?
Sterlingtimes
Posts: 2,579 Forumite
Wattson indicates grid import and grid export kWh.
My Smart Meter measures indicate:
[1] Active total import (fundamental and harmonic) kWh
[2] Active total export (fundamental and harmonic) kWh
[3] Reactive import kVARh
[4] Reactive export kVARh
[5] Test import
[6] Test export
Figures cumulative over approximately two days are as follows:
[1] 8.4 kWh
[2] 12.2 kWh
[3] 6.0 kVARh
[4] 3.3 kVARh
[5] 8.454 kWh
[6] 12.252 kWh
Is Wattson purporting to measure [1] and [2]? It is difficult to correlate.
Presumably [1] is the measure upon which I pay for my electricity.
My Smart Meter measures indicate:
[1] Active total import (fundamental and harmonic) kWh
[2] Active total export (fundamental and harmonic) kWh
[3] Reactive import kVARh
[4] Reactive export kVARh
[5] Test import
[6] Test export
Figures cumulative over approximately two days are as follows:
[1] 8.4 kWh
[2] 12.2 kWh
[3] 6.0 kVARh
[4] 3.3 kVARh
[5] 8.454 kWh
[6] 12.252 kWh
Is Wattson purporting to measure [1] and [2]? It is difficult to correlate.
Presumably [1] is the measure upon which I pay for my electricity.
I have osteoarthritis in my hands so I speak my messages into a microphone using Dragon. Some people make "typos" but I often make "speakos".
0
Comments
-
I don't know if this helps, but when I was looking into which energy monitor to go with about 6 months back I stayed away from the Wattson because it assumes a static voltage (240v I think) and a static Power Factor (from memory I think it was 1). Which would result in inaccuracies of about 10% compared to a proper utility meter. It was the same for most of the other energy monitors I looked at (e.g. Owl, Geo etc). The only one that measured as accurate as a utility meter was the Smappee, which was the one I went with in the end.
I think the power formula is this: Watts = amps x volts x power factor (maybe someone who's an electrician can verify this is correct)
Monitors that don't measure the volts and Power factor of a home will be inherently inaccurate. My Smappee is currently telling me my home has a power factor of 0.86 and the voltage is 233v, but even that varies all the time, amps are 1.272. My home is currently using 255watts. If I had a Wattson at the moment that would be showing me 305watts :eek: which is about 20% out.
You can see now why I opted for the Smappee now, measuring the volts and power factor is critical.
I don't know if this helps with your question but it's certainly worth knowing if you're trying to compare the readings from your Wattson to your meter - they just won't match.0 -
Now I can read accurate figures, I now know how the Wattson deviates from accurate measurements.

But much depends upon how and where the sensors are placed.I have osteoarthritis in my hands so I speak my messages into a microphone using Dragon. Some people make "typos" but I often make "speakos".0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards