We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Advice about re-mortgaging for how many years pls?

Rich1234a
Rich1234a Posts: 53 Forumite
Ninth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
edited 15 June 2015 at 11:08AM in Mortgages & endowments
Hi,

I wonder if anyone can offer me advice please?

I have a 25 year mortgage which has 19 years left. I am re-mortgaging with first direct as I want the option for unlimited overpayments - I want to pay off my mortgage asap.

I plan to have a 2 or 3 year fixed rate and have it paid off in that time with said overpayments.

My question is should I re-mortgage over a shorter term? i.e. 10 years? or should I leave it at 19 years.

I know that when shortening your term you have to be careful in case you get into financial difficulty - and then you can't easily switch back to smaller payments, but I have worked out that I could still easily afford the payments if it were over a 10 year term.

My question is, is there mathematically / financially a better way to go? ie. will I end up paying less by choosing one option?

Many thanks in advance,
Rich

Comments

  • libf
    libf Posts: 1,008 Forumite
    Rich1234a wrote: »
    Hi,

    I wonder if anyone can offer me advice please?

    I have a 25 year mortgage which has 19 years left. I am re-mortgaging with first direct as I want the option for unlimited overpayments - I want to pay off my mortgage asap.

    I plan to have a 2 or 3 year fixed rate and have it paid off in that time with said overpayments.

    My question is should I re-mortgage over a shorter term? i.e. 10 years? or should I leave it at 19 years.

    I know that when shortening your term you have to be careful in case you get into financial difficulty - and then you can't easily switch back to smaller payments, but I have worked out that I could still easily afford the payments if it were over a 10 year term.

    My question is, is there mathematically / financially a better way to go? ie. will I end up paying less by choosing one option?

    Many thanks in advance,
    Rich

    I would leave it at 19 years, use a mortgage calculator to work out what the payment would be for 10 years, and then pay that.

    Only thing I can think of that would make this more expensive is that you pay a redemption fee if you redeem before the full term completes. You'd need to check First Direct's policy on that.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Fixed rate will have overpayment penalties during the fixed period.

    If you can pay it off in 3y a tracker or offset may be a better option, the later giving you longer term access to cheap money(once 100% offset) for nothing and a lot more flexibility should the plan not work.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.