Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Crowd funding buy to let houses

12346»

Comments

  • buglawton
    buglawton Posts: 9,246 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    cells wrote: »
    there would be no way to have ONE landlord in the land, if all the uk rental properties were put into one company it would be worth more than £1 trillion and would be the most valuable company in the world

    I think there is room for a pure residential REIT in the FTSE 100. Or rather two such companies, one London focused and one rEngland focused. with about 30,000 properties each. Although they would both be big companies their combined stock would be just 1% of the private rental market, 0.5% of the rental market and just 0.2% of the housing market.

    Regarding the cost structure. I see no reason why it has to be high cost with dozens of directors drawing multimillion pounds each. I would see it closer to a large letting agent and expect it not to cost more than 10% of gross rent to run. Probably closer to 5%. So if it were a £10B company making £500m in rent the cost to run the company would have to be below £50m a year and ideally closer to the £30m a year mark.
    If it was run by Ryanair maybe. But it would probably end up being run like BT or SSE. I believe most of the truly efficient companies got as far as medium sized while still held privately, and only then went public. How would that work with a property portfolio?
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    cells wrote: »
    I have said this lots, but the UK needs a big residential company. A FTSE 100 that is in the top 10 or even the top 5

    Grainger.

    Though there at least 2 family empires that currently own more properties in total.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I signed up to 'Property Partner' a couple of months ago, I don't want to invest any more in property, I signed up mainly out of curiosity, but also to explore the possibility of other related potential opportunities.

    I keep getting emails from them presenting investments, like this one this morning:

    https://propertypartner.co/properties/UKBN213AR001?p=prop1&sc=marketplace-uk

    Even if I was intending to invest in property, I wouldn't do it this way, but I can see it catching on.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    cells wrote: »

    but on a small scale a landlord trying to convince others to hand over hundreds of thousands or their properties in return for shares would be a very difficult proposition.





    A mate of mine from HPC, DID set up a property fund for Berlin, it was all very pro (last time I looked).


    I looked at a Company called Dawnay Day Treveria a few years back which was investing in German real estate.


    I don't think it would be too hard -, as long as the company memorandum and rules offer total protection against fraud etc, indeed as I get older one day and tire of dealing with tenants I would be the sort to switch to indirect investment
  • Dan83
    Dan83 Posts: 673 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    There is s kind of property crowd fund going on s few streets away from me, basically a few residents got together, bought an empty house on the street and rented it out, now the group own and rent most of the house's in the street, the rent is reasonable, but I've heard they are very picky. When a house come up for rent they post a leaflet through everyone's door and advertise in local shop windows.
  • Prothet_of_Doom
    Prothet_of_Doom Posts: 3,267 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It would seem to me that selling shares in a company which then uses some of the money to leverage loans to buy rental properties, (or just buys them outright, is not exactly rocket science).
    At any point in time there are 2 ways of valuing the shares
    1) What are the assets of the company?
    2) What profit is made?

    Obviously as a shareholder you would have a vote at the AGM, which would include agreeing or not the salaries of directors, appointing or sacking directors, agreeing dividends to shareholders (or agreeing to reinvent in more stock)
    This could be via a ltd company or a PLC.
    Any other type of "crowd" funding would be a scam to my mind.
  • Dan83
    Dan83 Posts: 673 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    When you walk down the street, it's all nice and clean, no litter and all the gardens are nicely kept ect. A friend enquired about a house a while ago and he said part of the rules were, you had to park your car's on the drive and only visitors could park on the road outside, all rubbish had to go in the bin, no bin bags and the house front had to kept looking clean and presentable.

    If it works well, good for them, but I'd imadgibe there is nothing worse then landlords bugging you to cut grass ect
  • buglawton
    buglawton Posts: 9,246 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Conrad wrote: »
    A mate of mine from HPC, DID set up a property fund for Berlin, it was all very pro (last time I looked).

    I looked at a Company called Dawnay Day Treveria a few years back which was investing in German real estate.

    I don't think it would be too hard -, as long as the company memorandum and rules offer total protection against fraud etc, indeed as I get older one day and tire of dealing with tenants I would be the sort to switch to indirect investment

    The same Dawnay Day Treveria whos parent company went into receivership in 2008?
    Sometimes assets you can kick are more reassuring...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.