We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is it really that hard?
Comments
-
And the moral of the story...don't bother with Uni.Official MR B fan club,dont go............................0
-
ruggedtoast wrote: »Absolute rubbish. Everywhere has gone up exponentially, the home counties have rocketed in relation to wages.
Totally agree. I am going back to my home town of Reading. In a post I made earlier, I talked about the house prices there back in the 70s and 80s.
Prices now are just plain stupid. An example http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-52439921.html, this selling for £200,000.
Very congested area and certainly not the best. 18 years ago that would be selling for about £45,000. That is over a 400% increase. Hardly anywhere in line with wages. Then again we have " enjoyed " manipulation of the market and a freaky interest rate.
My cousin bought a property in Reading in approx. 1978 for £40,000. Now looking for about £550,000.
Oh if you want a laugh check this out.
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-34073778.html
:rotfl::)0 -
Could you give an example of something from a time when Henley-on-Thames was affordable?
1830, maybe?
This discussion always goes like this, and it's so tedious.
I'm reasonably sympathetic to the basic issue, and the answer is to distribute jobs better around the country, and build more homes.
However, citing a period cottage in Henley as "part of the problem" is nonsense.0 -
Cornucopia wrote: »Could you give an example of something from a time when Henley-on-Thames was affordable?
1830, maybe?
This discussion always goes like this, and it's so tedious.
I'm reasonably sympathetic to the basic issue, and the answer is to distribute jobs better around the country, and build more homes.
However, citing a period cottage in Henley as "part of the problem" is nonsense.
I expect a mere 15-20 years ago you could probably have bought that house priced at £650,000 now for no more than £150-200,000. It was relatively affordable then - sadly wages have not typically risen by 400% in that period.
Still - love the ad. No outside space and 'There is secure gated parking located minutes away'. Do they mean Henley station car park?:D0 -
I expect a mere 15-20 years ago you could probably have bought that house priced at £650,000 now for no more than £150-200,000. It was relatively affordable then - sadly wages have not typically risen by 400% in that period.
Still - love the ad. No outside space and 'There is secure gated parking located minutes away'. Do they mean Henley station car park?:D
That's probably true but 20 years ago prices in relation to earnings were at an all time low.0 -
I expect a mere 15-20 years ago you could probably have bought that house priced at £650,000 now for no more than £150-200,000. It was relatively affordable then - sadly wages have not typically risen by 400% in that period.
Of course houses are less than affordable than the mid-nineties - that was when they were most affordable. Comparisons against all time lows are useful in creating dramatic effect rather than insight.0 -
I'm with the OP. I used to earn 4p per annum and houses were 34p and now a house is 45bn and my salary is £34m so that means houses are 849000% bigger than a pineapple and 389000% smaller than a potato. It's SO obvious. The young are younger today than they were in my day. When I was 18 I was actually 7. Nowadays, 18 yr olds are 64. It's tragic.0
-
TheBlueHorse wrote: »I'm with the OP. I used to earn 4p per annum and houses were 34p and now a house is 45bn and my salary is £34m so that means houses are 849000% bigger than a pineapple and 389000% smaller than a potato. It's SO obvious. The young are younger today than they were in my day. When I was 18 I was actually 7. Nowadays, 18 yr olds are 64. It's tragic.
Post of the month for me :money:Left is never right but I always am.0 -
its much much more a London & SE problem than elsewhere
Prices in about half the country, NE NW W-Mids E-Mids Wales etc are the same they were 10 years ago in nominal terms and roughly what they were in real terms 20 years ago
London is now unaffordable for virtually everyone who was not already on the marry-go-round
You can not expect to buy a house in inner London now (£1m) unless you owned a similar priced house already or unless you are an extremely well paid household with annual income in the region of £200,000 to get a £750,000 mortgage.
Even further out in London where houses are £500,000 the story is the same, already own a house or have a household income of £100,000 which is quite rare
of course there are nearly a million social homes in London so plenty of poor people to work minimum wage jobs and slow London CPI with very low wages (relative to house prices)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards