We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
PhD
Comments
-
Guess it might depend on the subject but quite a few people i know, who did it full time did it in 3 years give or take a month or two.
I know that I plan on not going over the 3 years as my funding runs out at 3 years, and I think that i should get a job then and do not want to be doing a full-time job and writing up.0 -
-
Good to hear that there are jobs out there , hope is the same when I finish.
I doubt I will beable to sign on after as wont be eligible for cont based Jsa or income based0 -
Paully232000 wrote: »consider entering uni teaching before phd?
how possible is that really?
can one be a lecturer without PhD ?0 -
You should do a PhD for the sake of wanting expand knowledge in a specific area; not as a means of becoming a lecturer.
In fact most scientists I know are much happier doing the science bit of their job than the teaching bit.
You could always look here for funded courses - http://www.findaphd.com/
I managed to teach on a university masters course (only one lecturer/workshop/homework) with just my MSc behind me, and a few years experience as a research assistant0 -
how possible is that really?
can one be a lecturer without PhD ?
It is becoming harder and harder to get a job as a full-time lecturer without a PhD, unless you have some valuable professional experience behind you.
I am a visiting lecturer on a course, and have been for a number of years now, mainly based on my practical experience in the subject, and to a lesser degree, my research experience.
However, getting a full-time job is more difficult, with more and more adverts stating that a PhD is an essential requirement, not just, as it was a few years ago, a desirable charactieristic of applicants. This is, in part due to the requirements of research output as part of a lecturers role in many Universities which generates income.0 -
thanks!
I was thinking to get employed by a good company, will they fund my phd? can I do the phd while working, or it's mostly fulltime?
You could try NASA. They've probably got vacancies for astronauts and, as you seem to spend most of your time with your head in the clouds, you'd be perfect for it0 -
ringo_24601 wrote: »You should do a PhD for the sake of wanting expand knowledge in a specific area; not as a means of becoming a lecturer.
In fact most scientists I know are much happier doing the science bit of their job than the teaching bit.
To my mind this can be a weakness and appointing lecturers on the strength of their teaching ability and interest might sometimes be better for the undergraduates!But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,Had the whole of their cash in his care.
Lewis Carroll0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards