We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Whoops - BOE downgrades forecast and backs up labours concerns
Comments
-
I presume we'll now get all the bad news that was 'avoided' before the election?
Meh...
I'm still eagerly awaiting news of the top-secret massive new oil fields the Yes campaign promised us were being hidden until after the Scottish referendum.
Rather suspect we'll both be disappointed.;)“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
I should imagine that Graham's idea of a good day out is going to a Funeral.0
-
Wouldn't this be priced in to share prices?
It's something I think about quite a lot because I've invested heavily in high yield stocks over the last 6 years and can't work out if an income seeker would sell shares just to get an extra 1% (say) on cash savings.
If they do then the same argument might apply to BTL too as people sell up to get an increased yield on cash.
High yield shares have been so reliable I've not looked elsewhere - might need to alter the mindset as interest rate rises come through.
Personally I wouldn't, probably for the same reasons that you wouldn't, i.e. better tax treatment of dividend income (for higher rate tax payers) and the possibility of capital growth. But of course as you suggest, what will the crowd do?Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
chucknorris wrote: »Personally I wouldn't, probably for the same reasons that you wouldn't, i.e. better tax treatment of dividend income (for higher rate tax payers) and the possibility of capital growth. But of course as you suggest, what will the crowd do?
I almost certainly won't sell current holdings and will likely continue to chase dividends even if rates rise. However, I'm realising this would be down to habit rather than considering the effect of BoE rate rises on the economy.
I don't much care if people sell into rising rates either - cheaper shares for me. I discount the capital as soon as it's invested anyway and try to concentrate only on income. My thinking is that once dividend income = x then I'll retire. It's ingrained to the extent that if I spend £100 on something I consider the cost to be £100 plus c£4 per year loss of income every year for the rest of my life.
I realise not everyone thinks this way so I'm interested in what the practical effects might be on people's behaviour when rates rise. Other than some initial excitement at the wonder of BoE rates changing and a street party in Devon I wonder if the effects will be that profound especially given rates will have likely have risen because of positive changes in the economy.0 -
My question would be ....where are these new jobs going?
The global demand for skilled jobs; particularly new technology; has not really shown signs of diminishing.
Consumer demand for modern technology product is still strong. Additionally, there is a lot of research in medical technology expected to break through into new products, with demand from places like Africa and Asia driving change through.
Are we producing the right sort of graduates? Over a decade ago Gordon Brown recognised the need to create a knowledge-based economy. Did this translate into further education?
The knowledge economy is quite misleading. We are and will continue to be a knowledge economy in that patents and copyright and trademarks will become more and more valuable but that doesn't mean the masses will be involved in it.
in much the same way we are a manufacturing powerhouse but few people are employed in it
The majority of the future jobs in the UK will be simple service jobs (just as they are now). Retail chain, admin, banking and insurance, legal and professional services etc0 -
chucknorris wrote: »I seem to remember that when the base rate was first cut to 0.5%, some doomsters were saying that the economy was doomed, and like Japan, would be for decades, and that interest rates would stay low for that long (with deflation etc. etc.). Although still very unlikely, that 10 year anniversary is beginning to appear on the radar.
I seem to remember that someone on here thought interest rates would stay low for a long time and put his money where his mouth was and bought a dream home in 2010 with a 5 x salary mortgage. It was an interest rate gamble that continues to pay off to this very day. By the time interest rates start to move up, he'll have the same mortgage on a 6 bed farmhouse and some people have on a 3 bed semi.
This guy is an ordinary working class bloke made good and is adored by the other 'salt of the earth' members of the board, such as Graham Devon and shortchanged. He's a modern day hero!!0 -
I seem to remember that someone on here thought interest rates would stay low for a long time and put his money where his mouth was and bought a dream home in 2010 with a 5 x salary mortgage. It was an interest rate gamble that continues to pay off to this very day. By the time interest rates start to move up, he'll have the same mortgage on a 6 bed farmhouse and some people have on a 3 bed semi.
This guy is an ordinary working class bloke made good and is adored by the other 'salt of the earth' members of the board, such as Graham Devon and shortchanged. He's a modern day hero!!
Yes I think (obviously know) who you are talking about, Graham and shortchanged were big fans weren't they, almost as much as geneer was. I'm probably in the same position as you, i.e. not in any hurry for rates to rise.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
I almost certainly won't sell current holdings and will likely continue to chase dividends even if rates rise. However, I'm realising this would be down to habit rather than considering the effect of BoE rate rises on the economy.
What if the number of quality high yielders continues to diminish?0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »What if the number of quality high yielders continues to diminish?
Well if there aren't any good quality high yielders to buy then I can't buy them!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards