Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

1 in 4 MP's in Parliament is a landlord

This is an interesting article - I know its the Mirror (and old) but in my defence I arrived here via the BBC!


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/ampp3d/housing-crisis-more-landlords-parliament-5044990


With so many Landlords 'in power', with their own interests obviously in mind, can housing ever be truly reformed or changed?

Comments

  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,934 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Nope. Politicians will always do what serves themselves best.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    If you're interested, look up 'the railway interest' on the Googlenets.

    IIRC at one point 2/3rds of MPs had some kind of significant financial interest in a railway company in the 1870/80s.
  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    Generali wrote: »
    If you're interested, look up 'the railway interest' on the Googlenets.

    IIRC at one point 2/3rds of MPs had some kind of significant financial interest in a railway company in the 1870/80s.



    and what was the result?

    railways before most the rest of the world?

    a bad thing?



    The problem is, that the interest isn't in MPs owning building companies which might lead them to push for more building. Its owning homes, which means the opposite of potentially objecting to development.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    cells wrote: »
    and what was the result?

    railways before most the rest of the world?

    a bad thing?

    The result was the companies MPs partly owned could forecedly buy land cheaply. They could also vote to set up companies (companies needed to be set up by HoC vote at the time).

    As a result the canal system was bankrupted. The effective subsidy to the railway system drove the canal system out of business.
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,133 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Is there any evidence that MPs in their voting put their own personal benefit above those of their constituents?
    I think....
  • IronWolf
    IronWolf Posts: 6,445 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    michaels wrote: »
    Is there any evidence that MPs in their voting put their own personal benefit above those of their constituents?

    Besides it being basic human nature?

    MPs dont even need to be a landlord to benefit from rising house prices, they get elected then buy a new house in London and get the mortgage paid by HMT. Every 1% increase in that house price is cash in their pocket.
    Faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.