We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Taking dividends instead of salary

I was having a chat with a friend who thought it disgusting that people were avoiding tax by using limited companies instead of paye.

I was wondering how true this was so I found a couple of sites to help.

This one tells me that for pay of £70,600 via a limited company the take home pay would be £62k while this one tells me the same pay via straight paye would be £48k.

What a huge difference! Sadly though there's no way for me to do this in my job :o. Even if my salary was that high :(.

Comments

  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Yep there are downsides

    - No pension
    - No sick pay
    - No holiday pay
    - Less rights than a perm employee
  • asajj
    asajj Posts: 5,125 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Rampant Recycler
    Mostly contractors use limited companies though and as above there are many downsides to it as well. In addition, if they make a profit, they do pay corporation tax on it. So it is not as black and white as your friend believe.
    ally.
  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,626 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Davina40 wrote: »
    I was having a chat with a friend who thought it disgusting that people were avoiding tax by using limited companies instead of paye.

    I was wondering how true this was so I found a couple of sites to help.

    This one tells me that for pay of £70,600 via a limited company the take home pay would be £62k while this one tells me the same pay via straight paye would be £48k.

    What a huge difference! Sadly though there's no way for me to do this in my job :o. Even if my salary was that high :(.

    Its not as straightforward as that. If you're a contractor and working for a company its most likely you're going to fall foul of IR35 legislation and have to pay tax at PAYE rates.

    If your friend wants to feel disgusted about tax avoidance, i suggest she takes a look into Amazon, Starbucks, etc. OR looks in to how the banks cocked up but we as taxpayers had to bail THEM out.

    I'm an IT Contractor, and yes the rates are great, but there are down times. I'm between contracts at the min, so no revenue coming in. Plus i dont get paid sick days, or annual leave.

    Maybe your friend really needs to see the bigger picture.
  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,626 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    asajj wrote: »
    Mostly contractors use limited companies though and as above there are many downsides to it as well. In addition, if they make a profit, they do pay corporation tax on it. So it is not as black and white as your friend believe.

    Indeed.

    If i take a dividend from the company, then the company pays 20% tax on it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.