Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Miliband pledges to scrap stamp duty to woo first time buyers

according to FT

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CDi6G2yW0AEjQr7.jpg

not sure if I agree to be honest even though I own a first time buyer type of home. It will probably inflate the market more, so it doesn't help the buyer much. The lost revenue will also have to be made up from somewhere as well.
«134

Comments

  • padington
    padington Posts: 3,121 Forumite
    Nothing for the first 300k. That's going to buy a lot of votes.
    Proudly voted remain. A global union of countries is the only way to commit global capital to the rule of law.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    SDLT is a pretty lousy tax. I'd get rid of it completely.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    maybe a bad tax but increasing the demand side does not increase the supply so price will increase.
  • padington
    padington Posts: 3,121 Forumite
    edited 27 April 2015 at 12:07AM
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    maybe a bad tax but increasing the demand side does not increase the supply so price will increase.

    I think that's the point, his intention is to play with the property market in a socialist sense so that people with cheap houses certainly dont lose any money but people with pricey ones do and people renting get a better a deal altogether.

    I would take the 300k as a key line in the sand. Those properties have been earmarked to keep their price. Anything near 2 million plus have been ear marked to take a big hair cut.
    Proudly voted remain. A global union of countries is the only way to commit global capital to the rule of law.
  • hardnutman
    hardnutman Posts: 25 Forumite
    With a blanket cost limit it's another reason to force people out of London.
  • padington
    padington Posts: 3,121 Forumite
    edited 27 April 2015 at 8:49AM
    hardnutman wrote: »
    With a blanket cost limit it's another reason to force people out of London.

    The cost of housing is a very last reason why people move to a city. They move because of work or to be close to family or be at the heart of something special. The trade off people are prepared to make for this is staggering.

    When backpackers create their little bunkbed hostel 'cities' they sleep up to twenty in a room ...

    Never underestimate the gravitational pull of human beings.

    I'm placing no judgement on this however, it just is what it is.
    Proudly voted remain. A global union of countries is the only way to commit global capital to the rule of law.
  • cepheus
    cepheus Posts: 20,053 Forumite
    edited 27 April 2015 at 8:14AM
    padington wrote: »
    I think that's the point, his intention is to play with the property market in a socialist sense so that people with cheap houses certainly dont lose any money but people with pricey ones do and people renting get a better a deal altogether.

    I would take the 300k as a key line in the sand. Those properties have been earmarked to keep their price. Anything near 2 million plus have been ear marked to take a big hair cut.

    The limit is 300k whilst the average house price is 180k, so it encompasses perhaps three quarters of homes at a guess.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/416781/HPIReport20150325.pdf

    I guess Labour have London in mind where they are doing very well.
  • Fella
    Fella Posts: 7,921 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Kind of ironic Miliband is suggesting this considering the staggeringly large rises in stamp duty under Gordon Brown (When Miliband was of course, advisor to the Treasury).
  • wymondham
    wymondham Posts: 6,356 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Mortgage-free Glee!
    I think they should scrap it, or at least make it so that first timers AND those wishing to downsize don't pay, or how about just payable on houses over 500k that should just include those fortunate Londoners... :)
  • Fella
    Fella Posts: 7,921 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It should certainly be scrapped. It's a tax on mobility, a ridiculous & unfair concept.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.