We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Confused about this months contribution

I have had problems with my pension as described here: https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5222752

Payroll have now enrolled me on the correct scheme were the employer contributes 5% and I contribute 3%. However, it appears that I have contributed 3% and my employer has contributed 1%. I queried this with payroll and they said that the employer will start contributing next month.

Is it normal for the employer to start contributing one month after the employee starts contributing?

Comments

  • hyubh
    hyubh Posts: 3,791 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    w00519772 wrote: »
    Payroll have now enrolled me on the correct scheme were the employer contributes 5% and I contribute 3%.

    Great!
    Is it normal for the employer to start contributing one month after the employee starts contributing?

    Argh, I thought your claim was that you should have been enrolled correctly months ago? If so, stick to your guns and ask directly why the employer contributions have not been backdated.

    (That said, in answer to your question: if you were a new employee they could treat your employment as probationary and not contribute anything for three months without breaching auto-enrolement legislation. However, this scenario wouldn't appear to apply to you.)
  • w00519772
    w00519772 Posts: 1,297 Forumite
    hyubh wrote: »
    Great!



    Argh, I thought your claim was that you should have been enrolled correctly months ago? If so, stick to your guns and ask directly why the employer contributions have not been backdated.

    (That said, in answer to your question: if you were a new employee they could treat your employment as probationary and not contribute anything for three months without breaching auto-enrolement legislation. However, this scenario wouldn't appear to apply to you.)

    I am in talks with unison about the backdated payments. Are you saying that it is normal for the employer to delay payments by one month?

    I can only find one question on here about backdated pension payments. I am surprised by this. If anyone knows of any similar questions then please let me know.
  • hyubh
    hyubh Posts: 3,791 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    w00519772 wrote: »
    Are you saying that it is normal for the employer to delay payments by one month?

    No, I'm saying it's not out of the ordinary for an employer to only start paying pension contributions once (a) they have to and/or (b) the employee has been in the job long enough to show they're wanted (and want to stay).
    I can only find one question on here about backdated pension payments. I am surprised by this. If anyone knows of any similar questions then please let me know.

    I know it's to do with your pension arrangements, but this isn't really a 'pensions' issue as such - it's an employment one. If the employee benefit concerned was, say, different tiers of private health insurance instead, that wouldn't particularly change things as there would be no general 'rule' in either case.
  • w00519772
    w00519772 Posts: 1,297 Forumite
    Ok, thanks. Do you think I stand a good chance of recouping the lost payments? Unison are getting legal advice for me. I am just trying to see what other people think is reasonable.
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,524 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    Perhaps its a date effect - eg the company pay their contributions on a particular day of the month, which has now passed. Or it could be that it takes a bit of time to set up the company side of the payments. It seems much to early to start asking lawyers, just ask the payroll dept or your manager.
  • w00519772
    w00519772 Posts: 1,297 Forumite
    Linton wrote: »
    Perhaps its a date effect - eg the company pay their contributions on a particular day of the month, which has now passed. Or it could be that it takes a bit of time to set up the company side of the payments. It seems much to early to start asking lawyers, just ask the payroll dept or your manager.

    Unison are getting legal advice about the back payments to August 2013.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.