We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
the lunacy of buying off plan
zarf2007
Posts: 651 Forumite
so a well know london developer I was considering buying a property from (BTL, buy price £360,000, 25% deposit) is insisting that we exchange contracts within 28 days.
Now this would be ordinarily ok but as the completion is not until December they are insisting I pay the 10% deposit and exchange within that time without having a mortgage offer in place (Broker says any full application we do now would only be valid for six months so we would need to reapply, he is therefore recommending we apply in a couple of months time so that we would be ok).
He also tells me others who are buying in the development are exchanging without a mortgage offer and stand to lose their deposit (30K+) if they cant secure one after the event.
I find this whole situation a joke, when are lenders going to be reasonable and make mortgage offers last 9-12 months? The developers have no incentive to change, either way they get a nice fat deposit from people who cannot proceed and can sell the property onto the next mug in this market!!
TBH my credit file is fine but I really dont want to risk doing this even though the broker says 'it'll be ok', its not his money we are putting on the roulette table.
on a serious note, has the MMR regulations affected BTL at all? I realise BTL mortgages are unregulated but have heard that lenders doing both residential and BTL are likely to be more stringent with their BTL lending as overspill from the MMR on residential mortgages.
Now this would be ordinarily ok but as the completion is not until December they are insisting I pay the 10% deposit and exchange within that time without having a mortgage offer in place (Broker says any full application we do now would only be valid for six months so we would need to reapply, he is therefore recommending we apply in a couple of months time so that we would be ok).
He also tells me others who are buying in the development are exchanging without a mortgage offer and stand to lose their deposit (30K+) if they cant secure one after the event.
I find this whole situation a joke, when are lenders going to be reasonable and make mortgage offers last 9-12 months? The developers have no incentive to change, either way they get a nice fat deposit from people who cannot proceed and can sell the property onto the next mug in this market!!
TBH my credit file is fine but I really dont want to risk doing this even though the broker says 'it'll be ok', its not his money we are putting on the roulette table.
on a serious note, has the MMR regulations affected BTL at all? I realise BTL mortgages are unregulated but have heard that lenders doing both residential and BTL are likely to be more stringent with their BTL lending as overspill from the MMR on residential mortgages.
0
Comments
-
Berkeley homes perchance?0
-
When are the LENDERS going to be reasonable?
Thats a joke right?
Anything could happen to your income or credit file in 12 months, 6 months is plenty.
When are the DEVELOPERS going to start being reasonable would be my question!I am a Mortgage Adviser
You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
The developers don't need to be reasonable, presumably demand exceeds supply so they can set their own terms and the price to be paid now is much lower than it would be when the flat is completed.0
-
When are the LENDERS going to be reasonable?
Thats a joke right?
Anything could happen to your income or credit file in 12 months, 6 months is plenty.
When are the DEVELOPERS going to start being reasonable would be my question!
but what if after 6 months when you settled in the property you lose your job? it still doesnt leave you in a better position does it? My point being circumstances can change at anytime. I realise that things were too easy years ago with getting a mortgage but it is at stupid levels of difficulty now, down to scrutinising where i get my haircut......I really can understand FTBs saying screw it, whats the point.0 -
But with that logic neither do the lenders.
Either way, whos at risk? The consumer.
Also either way, when does the builder get paid? On completion. Theres no need for such a long time between exchange and completionI am a Mortgage Adviser
You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
lucie_1985 wrote: »The developers don't need to be reasonable, presumably demand exceeds supply so they can set their own terms and the price to be paid now is much lower than it would be when the flat is completed.
exactly, and your not far off
0 -
The developer is putting you in a position where you could lose thousands of pounds and you seem to be able to blame this on the mortgage lenders.
Im normally the last to stick up for them as I have seen numerous occassions when they have made illogical decisions, but offers are valid for a set time and this is known by both the buyer and the developer.I am a Mortgage Adviser
You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
I'm no expert (at all!) but given that it's buy to let wouldn't the affordability be based on the rental income achievable rather than your own income and outgoings?0
-
You would likely need a minimum earnt income depending on the lender.
Theres still the credit aspect to be aware of too.
I think we're talking in general terms, I certainly am.I am a Mortgage Adviser
You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
As I understand it, the developer wants an early exchange for cashflow purposes, leaving it any later/closer to completion of the building risks a price rise for the above buyer and no guarantee of being the buyer at all - there's no reason for the developer to honour any agreement to sell it to him without exchange.
We bought under similar circumstances 2 years ago, it was hideously stressful but in those two years we have seen a 75% price rise.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards