We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Withdrawal of Conditional Job offer after Accepetance

2»

Comments

  • Haptic
    Haptic Posts: 5 Forumite
    Hi,

    I'm now looking at getting some professional advice to see where I stand.

    Once again thank you for your replies
  • FBaby
    FBaby Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Haptic wrote: »
    The job was advertised on a online job website , it was advertised through the company itself and there was no agency Involved.
    I'd keep an eye to see whether they advertise your role again.
  • Put it down to experience and move on. As much as they would like to dress it up as something else it was your pregnancy which they objected to. I believe maternity leave is instantly entitled to, and that is just too much for them to bear.
  • sammyjammy
    sammyjammy Posts: 8,152 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Put it down to experience and move on. As much as they would like to dress it up as something else it was your pregnancy which they objected to. I believe maternity leave is instantly entitled to, and that is just too much for them to bear.

    Regardless, its illegal.
    "You've been reading SOS when it's just your clock reading 5:05 "
  • sammyjammy wrote: »
    Regardless, its illegal.

    Exactly my point.
  • Undervalued
    Undervalued Posts: 9,885 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Exactly my point.

    Well then your previous post makes no sense.

    Why should the OP "put it down to experience and move on" if she has suffered unlawful discrimination and as a result lost a significant amount of money?
  • Well then your previous post makes no sense.

    Why should the OP "put it down to experience and move on" if she has suffered unlawful discrimination and as a result lost a significant amount of money?

    It does. It is illegal if it can be proved, but since there are likely to be many "gotchas" for any prosecution claim to be watertight - even if a lawyer will defend the OP given the circumstances, the OP should consider putting it down to experience and move on.

    There is no guarantee the OP will get their old job back either.

    Sorry if I was unclear.
  • Undervalued
    Undervalued Posts: 9,885 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It does. It is illegal if it can be proved, but since there are likely to be many "gotchas" for any prosecution claim to be watertight - even if a lawyer will defend the OP given the circumstances, the OP should consider putting it down to experience and move on.

    There is no guarantee the OP will get their old job back either.

    Sorry if I was unclear.

    It is unlawful, not illegal (as that would be a criminal matter) so it would be a civil claim and not a prosecution. Plus, the OP would be the one making the claim so does not need someone to "defend" her!
  • Gavin83
    Gavin83 Posts: 8,757 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It depends on how honest they've been. If they can prove what they've stated to you as the reason then you have no case. However if they're lying and sacking you purely for your pregnancy then naturally thats a strong case. I'd keep an eye out to see if they put a new advert up.

    It does seem a weird stunt for them to pull though as you wouldn't have been entitled to SMP anyway.
  • Savvy_Sue
    Savvy_Sue Posts: 47,878 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Gavin83 wrote: »
    It does seem a weird stunt for them to pull though as you wouldn't have been entitled to SMP anyway.
    No, but she would have been entitled to take maternity leave within six months of starting a new job: if they've managed from January to March they might well prefer to get someone else in rather than face re-recruiting to cover her maternity leave.
    Signature removed for peace of mind
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.