We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Should I transfer my pension?

I currently have a personal pension with Scottish Widows with approx £62k value. I have recently started a pension scheme with my new employer who pays 7% on top of my contribution so I have reduced my SW payments to a minimum.

I pay 1% AMC to SW but only 0.47% to my works pension with L&G.

Should I transfer my £62k into the L&G pension? There is no transfer fee but is there anything else I should consider?

Any advice would be appreciated.
«1

Comments

  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Jazpro wrote: »
    I currently have a personal pension with Scottish Widows with approx £62k value. I have recently started a pension scheme with my new employer who pays 7% on top of my contribution so I have reduced my SW payments to a minimum.

    I pay 1% AMC to SW but only 0.47% to my works pension with L&G.

    Should I transfer my £62k into the L&G pension? There is no transfer fee but is there anything else I should consider?

    If you are going to go to the trouble of transferring it on grounds of cost, why not move to a cheaper provider than L&G?
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • I thought it would be better keeping it all in one place?
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,524 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    Jazpro wrote: »
    I thought it would be better keeping it all in one place?

    It doesnt matter much. You can merge modern DC pensions with minimal hassle at any time. If the new employers pension is significantly cheaper and/or offers a better choice of investments merge, otherwise dont.

    When you come to take your pension you can merge or transfer them all to another one if that's what you want to do.
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Jazpro wrote: »
    I thought it would be better keeping it all in one place?

    The convenience might suit you, it's true. My own experience is that reducing the number of accounts we hold has become more important as we've aged: not least because it will make things easier to manage for my widow. Before that, I think costs would matter more to me. But each to his own.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • If i am paying 1% on my 62k (£620 a year) surely only paying 0.47% by transferring it is a no brainer?
  • puk999
    puk999 Posts: 552 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 500 Posts
    Jazpro wrote: »
    If i am paying 1% on my 62k (£620 a year) surely only paying 0.47% by transferring it is a no brainer?

    Assuming there's no other provider where you will get it less than 0.47% (as has been already mentioned above).
  • Jazpro
    Jazpro Posts: 4 Newbie
    edited 26 March 2015 at 3:09PM
    puk999 wrote: »
    Assuming there's no other provider where you will get it less than 0.47% (as has been already mentioned above).

    Could there be any other catches that could cost me?
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Jazpro wrote: »
    Could there be any other catches that could cost me?

    Check whether you have a Guaranteed Annuity Rate, or any other perks (e.g. life insurance). Check whether there is a charge for transferring out.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • simonfitba
    simonfitba Posts: 176 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker Photogenic
    Just wondering where would be cheaper than 0.47%?

    I assume this fee is platform charge including fund choice.

    iii offer a SIPP for about £100 a year but you'll still need to pay 0.2-0.3 to hold a Vanguard Lifestrategy fund (for example).
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    simonfitba wrote: »
    Just wondering where would be cheaper than 0.47%?

    Consider https://www.youinvest.co.uk/sites/default/files/AJBYI_SIPP_charges_apr_2016.pdf

    The £25 p.q. fee equates to 0.16% p.a. for the OP, and there's no mention of extra charges for holding ETFs. So if he buys ETFs with internal charges of (say) 0.14% p.a. then he's looking at a total of 0.3% p.a., plus dealing charges and stamp duty. (Do you pay stamp duty on ETFs?) Whether the OP wants a SIPP is a fair question.

    How about a Personal Pension through Cavendish Online?
    Free the dunston one next time too.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.