We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Expected more than I've been offered
I have just received a letter from Barclays who are dealing with my old Egg card claim. They have only offered me £64.41 should I accept it?
They say I only paid £36 but I dont know if this is true.
Should I take it or challenge it?
Thanks in advance
Comments
-
Ask them for a breakdown, they wouldn't normally tell porkies to be honest.
I presume the difference is interest.make the most of it, we are only here for the weekend.
and we will never, ever return.0 -
Ask them for a breakdown, they wouldn't normally tell porkies to be honest.
I presume the difference is interest.
I just cannot believe your statement. Barclays Bank not normally telling
porkies ? Where have you been the last few years ? On Mars ?
This is just another example of pro institutional bias prevalent on this
particular website.0 -
They say I only paid £36 but I dont know if this is true.
Should I take it or challenge it?
What evidence do you have that you paid more?
By all means ask them for a breakdown of what you paid but if neither of you have any evidence you paid more then that is what you get. If statements no longer exist, there is an averaging process that can be used based on the evidence of the amounts paid when statements did exist. This can lead to some people getting more than they actually paid and some getting less.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
I just cannot believe your statement. Barclays Bank not normally telling
porkies ? Where have you been the last few years ? On Mars ?
This is just another example of pro institutional bias prevalent on this
particular website.
And your proof they are lying about the sums is...... ?Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
And your proof they are lying about the sums is...... ?
I could have guessed you would respond to my post ! You have just confirmed my observation about this website.
I will not go in to why you are on this website most mornings and afternoons instead of doing your Logistics job !0 -
I could have guessed you would respond to my post ! You have just confirmed my observation about this website.
I will not go in to why you are on this website most mornings and afternoons instead of doing your Logistics job !
So you have no proof of your accusations - so essentially slander!
Maybe you should go to bed earlier to be in work on time
Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards