We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Final Salary, AVC vs FSAVC

Hi, I'm fortunate that I am in an University Final Salary Pension Scheme. I would like opinions on adding to this. I am 52 and intend to retire at 60
I would like to use my taxable earnings that have creeped above the higher rate as I can manage on a lower salary income.

1, Is this a good idea
2, If so, with the new pension rules coming out, would I be better taking out and using an FSAVC to take a larger lump sum (on retirement) and keep more lump sum in my work pension.

hope this is clear :)
Jako

Comments

  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Are you referring to the AVC supplied by the Pru?
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • jakowako
    jakowako Posts: 22 Forumite
    Yes, I believe that it is?
    Jako
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    In that case the new rules don't have any bearing on it. If you want to take as large a lump sum as you can combined with a large USS pension then the AVC is the way to do it. But beware: if you take a larger pension than your standard USS pension (by virtue of giving up some USS lump sum), you don't get extra widow's pension.

    Secondly, by retiring at 60 rather than 65 you'll lose rather a lot on the pension by "actuarial reduction". So it might be better to accumulate as much as you can in a personal pension of some sort and then at 60 live off that money for a while so you can defer taking the USS pension until you are nearer 65.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • dunroving
    dunroving Posts: 1,903 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    This is exactly what I am doing. The Pru give regular presentations in which they advertise the headline "take 100% of your Pru AVCs tax-free"


    The small print often isn't spelled out, but essentially, as long as it isn't more than 25% of the total value of your USS benefits plus value of your Pru pot, you can take all of it tax-free.


    As suggested, this allows you to inverse-commute the USS tax free sum into USS pension, if that's what you're looking for.


    The USS online modeller is pretty good - have you used it? It allows you to fiddle with your retirement age, and fiddle with the USS tax-free cash (e.g., to set it to zero, to see how much additional pension you can get).


    The drawback is that you can't take bits and pieces from the Pru/USS at different times - it's all or none. That's why it may also be a good idea to have an additional SIPP, if you want to postpone taking USS pension (in order to avoid a reduced pension due to early retirement), and will need some cash to tide you over until 65 (or 66).
    (Nearly) dunroving
  • jakowako
    jakowako Posts: 22 Forumite
    Hi, my pension scheme is STSS and not USS, don't know if that makes any difference. Also could you comment on the contributions, does it make sense to use part of wages that is in 40% tax? Cheers
    Jako
  • dunroving
    dunroving Posts: 1,903 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    jakowako wrote: »
    Hi, my pension scheme is STSS and not USS, don't know if that makes any difference. Also could you comment on the contributions, does it make sense to use part of wages that is in 40% tax? Cheers



    Not sure what you mean - any pension contributions will first come out of the top end of your salary - the part being taxed at 40%.


    Absolutely yes, I'd say pay this into some pension or other - why pay 40% tax? I presume that in retirement you will only be a 20% tax payer ...?
    (Nearly) dunroving
  • jakowako
    jakowako Posts: 22 Forumite
    Yeh thanks
    Jako
  • redbuzzard
    redbuzzard Posts: 718 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 11 March 2015 at 8:10PM
    Pensions are clearly better value with 40% tax relief even if you only get 25% back tax free. If you put all the extra contributions into AVCs so as to take the AVCs tax free (assuming you are allowed to do that) then it's £6000 net cost in, £10000 out, even without any investment growth - a 66.7% uplift. if you only use the 40% taxed element of income to do it.

    In any case, doing AVCs with your employer means you get the tax relief immediately - if you did it separately, you'd need to claim back the higher rate element from HMRC afterwards.
    "Things are never so bad they can't be made worse" - Humphrey Bogart
  • jakowako
    jakowako Posts: 22 Forumite
    Thanks for all comments, cheers
    Jako
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.