We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Union to Strike for the Right for Drunks to Drive Trains

Generali
Posts: 36,411 Forumite

http://www.lbc.co.uk/tube-strike-announced-for-saturday-evening-105702
Perhaps if you drive a train with 800 (?) people on board you could at least turn up to work sober. Why on earth did this drunk get a second chance?
Perhaps if you drive a train with 800 (?) people on board you could at least turn up to work sober. Why on earth did this drunk get a second chance?
0
Comments
-
the union has described its policy as "outdated and flawed."
Are they referring to the RMT policy, or the policy of TFL ?
In recent news, Scotland reduced their drink drive limit, and the Government has begun a much harsher regime me to stop people driving cars whilst using certain recreacational and prescription drugs................no doubt in the RMT's opinion both "outdated" policies too.'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
Don't worry, the BBC had a piece on how to renationalise the railways today so mahosive wages, strikes and drunk drivers will be available nationwide after the next election when Labour's union financial backers call in their markers.I think....0
-
If we're looking for an easy place for the Zombie Apocalypse to get started it seems as if the London Underground is absolutely made for driverless trains.
It's far more complicated to get driverless cars on the road than automate the underground and yet we'll probably see driverless cars on UK roads first.
Nonsense like this can only speed the process. It's not very reassuring to know a train driver failed a breath test and even less so to find out the union think he should remain in post.0 -
What's the background to this? The article doesn't really give any indication, though they confirm their side to the argument when they describe the union representative "having a meltdown on air last time they spoke".
The article doesn't really give any detail, though their bias comes across strongly.
I can't honestly believe a strike would take place because someone who was drunk was sacked. That would be truly absurd.... ! Open to being astonished though!!!0 -
Isn't the background that the driver is a union official and the union claim that he was only subjected to random breath tests for reasons of victimisation?
Interesting that it is kicking off with a short strike on a Saturday - could this be the union testing the water to see if their members will actually come with them on this one?I think....0 -
Is this the same issue as discussed in this thread?
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5173534
if so post #5 is relevant.0 -
Whats the worst that could happen ?
Only a couple of teeny weenly likke drinkypoo'sI do Contracts, all day every day.0 -
RichardD1970 wrote: »Is this the same issue as discussed in this thread?
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5173534
if so post #5 is relevant.
Thanks, so the driver actually has a medical condition (Hypoglycemia) which is proven to sway the results of these tests.
He therefore needs a blood test to determine alcohol levels, as a breath sample could give false readings. The Blood Test was refused.
Theres a need for action there. If it has to go as far as a strike I don't think that's a reflection on the workforce. More a reflection on the business for not sorting it.0 -
FWIW:
Random breath tests etc are a way of life for anyone working in a safety critical role on the railway and have been for years. (i.e. Drivers, Guards, signalmen etc).
They are both routine when ANY operating incident happens (whether this involved the member of staff directly or indirectly) and also randomised with no reason for doing them.
Breath and urine samples are taken so drink/drugs are all checked.
The Railways limit was around 1/2 of that of drink/driving IIRC when I was a railwayman (some years back now) and are very strictly adhered to.
I would like the know the background to this story before I make my own mind up frankly.
edit: thankyou to Graham_Devon s posting above we can see this is a case of not knowing the full story leading some to jump to incorrect conclusions.Unless specifically stated all posts by me are my own considered opinion.
If you don't like my opinion feel free to respond with your own.0 -
If we're looking for an easy place for the Zombie Apocalypse to get started it seems as if the London Underground is absolutely made for driverless trains.....
Already done.
There are driverless trains on the Docklands Light Railway and on the Victoria, Central and Jubilee lines.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/davehillblog/2012/feb/29/boris-johnson-driverless-underground-trains0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards