We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Legal situation if tenanted flat is broken into
flossy_splodge
Posts: 2,544 Forumite
Does anyone KNOW for sure the situation if a flat that is being rented is damaged through a break in? :eek:
The perpetrator is known, was caught by the Police but hadn't removed any items so was deemed to be only liable to civil law for smashing a window to get in.
The landlord claimed its not their responsibility to pay for the window.
I thought contents were the responsibility of the tenant and fabric of the building is the responsibility of the landlord.
Any thoughts please?
The perpetrator is known, was caught by the Police but hadn't removed any items so was deemed to be only liable to civil law for smashing a window to get in.
The landlord claimed its not their responsibility to pay for the window.
I thought contents were the responsibility of the tenant and fabric of the building is the responsibility of the landlord.
Any thoughts please?
0
Comments
-
Section 11 LTA 1985:
there is implied a covenant by the lessor—
(a)to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling-house (including drains, gutters and external pipes) ...
Therefore it is up to the LL to repair. The cost can, in theory, be recouped from the person who did the damage - but the LL cannot refuse to do the repair itself.0 -
The LL is responsible for the structure (Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 ) unless he can show the tenant was responsible for the damage.
Landlord can claim off his insurance, or, indeed, he could sue the perpetrator for the cost of the damage since the perpetrator is known and can, presumably, be proved to have been responsible.0 -
When a similar thiing happened to me, this is what I tried to explain to my LL. He still refused to get the window repaired, in spite of having a police report and crime number. He wouldn't even board it up. But I still believe that he should have done as it is part of the 'structure' of the house.0
-
when I lived in Council housing (pre 1991 ) I know they insisted the tenant pay for broken windows .I had two broken windows in one night ."Do not regret growing older, it's a privilege denied to many"0
-
when I lived in Council housing (pre 1991 ) I know they insisted the tenant pay for broken windows .I had two broken windows in one night .
Council housing is a different tenancy regime and does not apply to the AST regime which the OP will have (assuming living in England/Wales).0 -
Note that these repair obligations have nothing to do with ASTs.0
-
The perp. is responsible:
However the landlord, as indicated above, has an obligation to repair: (I think he still has that obligation, even if damage caused by tenant). Can't see anywhere in the Act where it says T is responsible (under the Act) if he caused it, albeit sensible LLs & Ts will agree T will pay: Not all LLs or Ts are sensible though. In this case it is then up to LL to claim of criminal - or not.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards