We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

official receiver

Is the official receiver commision based? so more they can get assett/money wise the more they earn?

Comments

  • TheGardener
    TheGardener Posts: 3,303 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I very much doubt it - OR's are public sector workers and commission based work would be highly unusual.
  • dojoman
    dojoman Posts: 12,027 Forumite
    In a word, no and why would you think such a thing?
    :pB&SC No. 298
    Life`s Tragedy is that we get OLD too soon
    and WISE too late!
  • definite no on that question, very odd question to ask though! they do work to a level of integrity and are audited on whether they do there job properly to gain a full insight and secure funds for creditors, like a lot of people in similar roles they are experienced in "having a nose" for someone who is hiding assets or funds and take a very dim view of it.
    every time I manage to get one more breath into this body, I will sing a song of thanks to you my brothers, my sisters, my friends, may your sleep be peaceful, and angels sing sweetly in your ears.
  • alastairq
    alastairq Posts: 5,030 Forumite
    edited 19 February 2015 at 10:39AM
    The Official Receiver is a Court Officer.

    They work for the Insolvency Service, which is a Government body.

    In other words, they are employed by the State!

    I Suspect two points of confusion have arisen here?

    [1], A significant proportion of a BAnkruptcy estate goes to the Insolvency Service, to pay for the cost of administering a Bankruptcy.

    [The Government wishes the Insolvency Service to be self-financing, thus not placing an undue burden on the taxpayer?} The admin costs have the first claim.

    As tigger says above, the OR has a Duty in Law, to seek out all assets in Bankruptcy....and to that end, has at their disposal a huge number of Legal tools to achieve that.

    [2] There is a huge difference between the Official Receiver, and an Insolvency Practitioner.

    An IP is appointed by the Official Receiver to manage disposal of assets in Bankruptcy...and therefore, being a private individual, can apply costs which may seem disproportionate.
    No, I don't think all other drivers are idiots......but some are determined to change my mind.......
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.