We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

VCS trying Court in Scotland.

«1

Comments

  • bazster
    bazster Posts: 7,436 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Been bubbling under for a few weeks now. Interesting it certainly will be.
    Je suis Charlie.
  • andy13
    andy13 Posts: 216 Forumite
    So the man with more than 30 invoices has declared to a journo that he was the driver and he read and understood the signs.

    DOH!!
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I suppose there was always a case that they may try it if the drivers are supposedly known (the article mentions the drivers , as opposed to keepers)

    lets hope they lose all of them, based on the law being against them up there

    a few precedents in law wouldnt go amiss, cant see a judgement for thousands or tens of thousands of pounds in back tickets being allowed

    as you all say, be interesting to know the outcomes , especially when we tell people to ignore tickets and debt collectors in scotland
  • ManxRed
    ManxRed Posts: 3,530 Forumite
    andy13 wrote: »
    So the man with more than 30 invoices has declared to a journo that he was the driver and he read and understood the signs.

    DOH!!

    It gets my goat when people make it too easy for PPC's to win cases, which the PPC then uses as propaganda to scare other victims into paying up.
    Je Suis Cecil.
  • pour encourager les autres
    obviously too much ignoring going on en Ecosse
  • nicechap
    nicechap Posts: 2,852 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Sounds like Perky & Stephen Thomas (? if memory serves me correctly) is being reincarnated to justify their approach. Did anyone ever find out whether Stephen Thomas actually was real or an employee/ stooge to justify the whole Chebang.
    Originally Posted by shortcrust
    "Contact the Ministry of Fairness....If sufficient evidence of unfairness is discovered you’ll get an apology, a permanent contract with backdated benefits, a ‘Let’s Make it Fair!’ tshirt and mug, and those guilty of unfairness will be sent on a Fairness Awareness course."
  • The Problem is judges are getting fed up of sitting over parking cases, the temptation just to let the parking firm scalp motorist must be very strong.

    They must be reminded that as judges they sit to protect the public from unlawful practices by greedy people who seek to get rich from the backs of hard working people without breaking a sweat.
    £100 is a fortnights food budget to a hard working family, judges must not help these sharks steal the food from the mouths of children.
    I do Contracts, all day every day.
  • ManxRed
    ManxRed Posts: 3,530 Forumite
    The Problem is judges are getting fed up of sitting over parking cases, the temptation just to let the parking firm scalp motorist must be very strong.

    But that would result in more court cases. Finding for the motorist would result in fewer!

    I know what you mean though, you're talking in terms of length of hearing.
    Je Suis Cecil.
  • Fergie76
    Fergie76 Posts: 2,293 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The Problem is judges are getting fed up of sitting over parking cases, the temptation just to let the parking firm scalp motorist must be very strong.

    They must be reminded that as judges they sit to protect the public from unlawful practices by greedy people who seek to get rich from the backs of hard working people without breaking a sweat.
    £100 is a fortnights food budget to a hard working family, judges must not help these sharks steal the food from the mouths of children.

    To my knowledge though, there haven't been in court cases in Scotland for many years. UKPC tried before Christmas, but dropped them at the last minute.

    And it's Sheriff's in Scotland, not judges... ;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.