We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Where did my contracted out contributions go?

I have been reviewing 2 of my deferred pensions and both state that I was contracted out, for a long period of time and paid a reduced rate of NI. Now this may be a stupid question, but where did my contracted out contributions go?
My wife clearly has a separate scheme for her contracted out payments, administered by a Standard Life, but I have nothing from either of my previous pension schemes. There is some reference to a guaranteed minimum pension and protected rights, is this relevant?

The more I think I have got to grips with my pensions, the less I feel I know :(
«1

Comments

  • Hedgehog99
    Hedgehog99 Posts: 1,425 Forumite
    AIUI, when contracted out, that meant you weren't paying SERPS / S2P (the earnings-related "second state pension"), but you were paying into your employer's scheme instead. That should mean you get an employer's pension that should be worth more than SERPS / S2P would have been if you'd paid the extra NI for those years.

    So "where are they?" = they are your employers' pensions for those years. They're either waiting for you to claim them when you retire or you moved them when you changed jobs so that the investment was transferred to your next employer's scheme.
  • Mirador
    Mirador Posts: 58 Forumite
    Thanks for the reply Hedgehog99. My wife was also contracted at the same time, but she has two separate funds, her final salary deferred scheme and a separate scheme funded by the rebates received from the government, hence my original question. Are you saying that there were 2 options then, either set up a separate scheme or absorb into company scheme? Thanks
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,686 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    Mirador wrote: »
    Thanks for the reply Hedgehog99. My wife was also contracted at the same time, but she has two separate funds, her final salary deferred scheme and a separate scheme funded by the rebates received from the government, hence my original question. Are you saying that there were 2 options then, either set up a separate scheme or absorb into company scheme? Thanks
    The usual way would be to absorb into the company scheme, and as in your OP there's an element of it called the GMP (though this just applies to pre 1997 contributions, after that the scheme just had to meet certain minimum standards, without having a guaranteed element).
  • Mirador
    Mirador Posts: 58 Forumite
    xylophone wrote: »

    Thanks for the link, that makes sense as her COSR has a guarantee rate of 4.5%. Looks like our refunds were simply handled differently
  • smjxm09
    smjxm09 Posts: 672 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    It has struck me that the motivation for being opted out was to save my company money rather than do me any favours.

    I was paying 1/80 per year regardless of whether I was contacted in or out. 40 years service = half pay.

    The benefit for me during the contacting out period was slightly lower NI contributions during those years, which would have had no impact on my day to day life as those savings were negligible but those lower NI contributions will have a major impact during my retirement.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,686 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    smjxm09 wrote: »
    It has struck me that the motivation for being opted out was to save my company money rather than do me any favours.

    I was paying 1/80 per year regardless of whether I was contacted in or out. 40 years service = half pay.

    The benefit for me during the contacting out period was slightly lower NI contributions during those years, which would have had no impact on my day to day life as those savings were negligible but those lower NI contributions will have a major impact during my retirement.
    The company would have put far more than the saved NI into the pension. 1/80th is an excellent pension, most people (outside the public sector) have far worse company pensions.
  • greenglide
    greenglide Posts: 3,301 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker Hung up my suit!
    smjxm09 wrote: »
    It has struck me that the motivation for being opted out was to save my company money rather than do me any favours.

    I was paying 1/80 per year regardless of whether I was contacted in or out. 40 years service = half pay.

    The benefit for me during the contacting out period was slightly lower NI contributions during those years, which would have had no impact on my day to day life as those savings were negligible but those lower NI contributions will have a major impact during my retirement.
    The employer benefits from lower employers NI but in return has to provide provide you with a significantly better pension. SERPS / S2P would have never been able to provide you with half of your pensionable salary.

    Having been not contracted out during that period would have been nice but in practice this tends to be with the benefit of hindsight. Would you really have opted to pay higher NI contributions to remain not contracted out if you had been given the choice? Most people would have tended not to.
  • smjxm09
    smjxm09 Posts: 672 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    Would you really have opted to pay higher NI contributions to remain not contracted out if you had been given the choice? Most people would have tended not to.

    If I and no doubt others were told the consequences all those years ago there would have been a lot less contracting out but no one had a crystal ball to see the consequences of a decision that was basically made for us by companies looking to save some money.
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,850 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    smjxm09 wrote: »
    If I and no doubt others were told the consequences all those years ago there would have been a lot less contracting out but no one had a crystal ball to see the consequences of a decision that was basically made for us by companies looking to save some money.

    Of course they were looking to save money as in most cases they were contributing 15% or more and you got a significantly better pension.

    Your 1/80ths scheme may very well have been a 1/90ths scheme or an 1/80ths scheme minus state pension without that NI saving.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.