We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Employer withheld a better pension.
peppered
Posts: 40 Forumite
Hi, hopefully someone will be able to help out.
The company I worked for were taken over 2 years ago and our pension provisions stayed the same as they were before the takeover. But recently we found out that the new owners had a better pension scheme in place with bigger employer contributions and we weren't made aware of this fact. Everyone is now joining this better scheme but we are angry that it was purposely withheld from us for nearly two years.
Are we entitled to compensation and topping up of our schemes from the date we COULD HAVE joined the better scheme?
Thanks in advance.
Terry.
The company I worked for were taken over 2 years ago and our pension provisions stayed the same as they were before the takeover. But recently we found out that the new owners had a better pension scheme in place with bigger employer contributions and we weren't made aware of this fact. Everyone is now joining this better scheme but we are angry that it was purposely withheld from us for nearly two years.
Are we entitled to compensation and topping up of our schemes from the date we COULD HAVE joined the better scheme?
Thanks in advance.
Terry.
I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde
Oscar Wilde
0
Comments
-
Would you have been bothered if it was a worse scheme ?0
-
Yes. More compensation, that's what the world is short of!0
-
It would depend on the terms of the take-over.
Normally there would be no requirement to give you access to the parent company's pension scheme unless you actually became an employee of the new company.
It should have been detailed in the take-over details which I assume you have read?
If they have a better scheme which they have decided to let employees of the taken-over company join that would seem ok.
If, however, you became an employee of the new company and the scheme has been open for anyone to join they should have ley you from the date you joined them.
The devil is in the detail.0 -
Thanks for the sensible answer.
Yes we became employees of the new parent company and the better pension has been offered to all new starters who joined after the takeover. We only found out after one employee left the old scheme to open his own, independent pension then decided to rejoin the company provided one and was shocked how much better the company one was. After talking to his work colleagues they realised the company had withheld the better pension to all existing employees. When questioned, the HR department was quoted as saying " we didn't think anyone would be interested as the employee contributions are slightly higher " although we have since found out in the joining pack that the employee contributions are not any higher!
Regards.greenglide wrote: »It would depend on the terms of the take-over.
Normally there would be no requirement to give you access to the parent company's pension scheme unless you actually became an employee of the new company.
It should have been detailed in the take-over details which I assume you have read?
If they have a better scheme which they have decided to let employees of the taken-over company join that would seem ok.
If, however, you became an employee of the new company and the scheme has been open for anyone to join they should have ley you from the date you joined them.
The devil is in the detail.I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde0 -
There would normally have been a consultation as part of the take over process. During that there would have been employee representatives selected. Those employee representatives appear to have somewhat failed in their responsibilities.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards