We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Petrol now 99.7p a litre
Comments
-
is that evidence of collusion?
No.
But there is overwhelming evidence that people don't always go for the cheapest prices - although it is a big factor for many.0 -
I am waiting until I see 99.9p or less before refilling, I have quarter of a tank left.0
-
No.
But there is overwhelming evidence that people don't always go for the cheapest prices - although it is a big factor for many.
The issue was whether the local garages collude to set the price at a high price.
The 'evidence' was that local prices tend to be the same
If all other things are equal, for undifferentiated products like petrol, then most (but not all) people will buy the cheapest.
This will lead to most local garages having similar prices: because if one charges a higher price most (but not all) people will go elsewhere.
Now I accept that if all other things are not the same e.g. location, side of the road, inbuilt hatred of a particular brand, perceived rudeness of the staff, location of convenience store, attractive cashiers, loyalty card, indifference to price (maybe company petrol card/spouse/parents pays the CC bill) etc then people may make a choice to pay more for the product.
However I don't think this shows that the petrol stations have colluded to maintain a high price.
That's not to say they haven't so colluded, but merely saying that similar prices is insufficient evidence to draw that collusion.
That's all I meant. I thought that was obvious.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards