We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

how do i avoid capital gains tax

Hi everyone new here I was wondering if anyone can help me?
My in-laws own a house that they inherited years ago and rent out.
They are advancing in age and are thinking of retiring and would like to sell the house to fund there retirement. But as you know they would have to pay a lot of tax if they do what are there options to reduce there burden thanks in advance.
«1

Comments

  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Hi everyone new here I was wondering if anyone can help me?
    My in-laws own a house that they inherited years ago and rent out.
    They are advancing in age and are thinking of retiring and would like to sell the house to fund there retirement. But as you know they would have to pay a lot of tax if they do what are there options to reduce there burden thanks in advance.


    They could sell the house that they live in instead (assuming that it has always been their main residence) and move into the investment property.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • Cook_County
    Cook_County Posts: 3,093 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    They could leave the UK for more than 5 tax years.


    They could borrow against the property but keep the property until the second death so there is only one level of tax, ie IHT, rather than CGT plus IHT on the cash left after the CGT.
  • Spidernick
    Spidernick Posts: 3,803 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    They could leave the UK for more than 5 tax years.

    That won't work from 6 April, as CGT will then be payable on residential property for non-UK tax residents:

    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/aadb2d8e-76f2-11e4-8273-00144feabdc0.html
    'I want to die peacefully in my sleep, like my father. Not screaming and terrified like his passengers.' (Bob Monkhouse).

    Sky? Believe in better.

    Note: win, draw or lose (not 'loose' - opposite of tight!)
  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,572 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My in-laws own a house that they inherited years ago and rent out.

    They are advancing in age and are thinking of retiring and would like to sell the house to fund there retirement.

    But as you know they would have to pay a lot of tax if they do what are there options to reduce there burden thanks in advance.

    They will only have to pay tax on the increase in value minus their allowances. Have you done a rough calculation to see what the bill would be?
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    They could leave the UK for more than 5 tax years.



    The loophole of leaving the country for 5 years is being/has now been closed.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Spidernick wrote: »
    That won't work from 6 April, as CGT will then be payable on residential property for non-UK tax residents:

    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/aadb2d8e-76f2-11e4-8273-00144feabdc0.html

    We were looking into moving to the Isle of Man, but then realised that we were too late, just as well we hadn't moved 3 years ago, we would have been gutted.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • Mojisola wrote: »
    They will only have to pay tax on the increase in value minus their allowances. Have you done a rough calculation to see what the bill would be?

    Unfortunately they inherited the house a fair few years ago so the value has gone up considerably dunno how it works exactly so any help is greatly appreciated
  • Savvy_Sue
    Savvy_Sue Posts: 47,626 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 10 January 2015 at 9:58PM
    Unfortunately they inherited the house a fair few years ago so the value has gone up considerably dunno how it works exactly so any help is greatly appreciated
    Your starting point is its value when they inherited (and did they inherit it jointly, and if not when did they transfer it into joint names?), and its value today.

    Then you need month and year they inherited, and projected month and year of sale, although in this case the dates will be less critical [STRIKE]if it has always been rented out because you can only claim lettings relief for a certain number of months.[/STRIKE]because there won't be any relief for it having been PPR and subsequently let out (see spidernick's post below).
    Signature removed for peace of mind
  • Spidernick
    Spidernick Posts: 3,803 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Letting relief can only be claimed if the property was the Principle Private Residence at some point, which would not seem to be the case here. I think Savvy Sue meant this, but was a little unclear.

    To the OP I would say that there isn't really any way to mitigate the CGT if the property has never been their main residence, other than going down the route suggested in #2 above, if that was a possibility. Saying that the let property may be nowhere near where your in-laws currently live and may not be somewhere they would like to live or the right type of property for them.

    Can the current letting income not help fund their retirement? If they do want to sell the let property then it will be a case of working out the CGT due as at #6 above. At the end of the day, with a second property at their disposal they are most likely in a better position than most people of their age.
    'I want to die peacefully in my sleep, like my father. Not screaming and terrified like his passengers.' (Bob Monkhouse).

    Sky? Believe in better.

    Note: win, draw or lose (not 'loose' - opposite of tight!)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.