📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Changes to pensions

Options
I im sitting here wondering . What is exactly the change to the pensions April 2015 As I thought you could already take out 25% of your pensions.
«134

Comments

  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,638 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I im sitting here wondering . What is exactly the change to the pensions April 2015 As I thought you could already take out 25% of your pensions.

    You can.

    The difference is that from April 2015 you can take out the whole pot, subject to tax on the remaining 75%. Previously you could not do that.
  • atush
    atush Posts: 18,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    But if you want to s=or should take the pension then at all, or any of the 75%, will depend on your situation at the time.

    It is daft to take pensions, when you dont need them, and pay tax on them you would not have to pay if you waited.
  • worn_out
    worn_out Posts: 172 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    Govt trying to boost spending in the economy, seeing as it's flatlining because a lot of people are skint.. once the pension pot has gone, what then ?
  • Sapphire
    Sapphire Posts: 4,269 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Debt-free and Proud!
    worn_out wrote: »
    Govt trying to boost spending in the economy, seeing as it's flatlining because a lot of people are skint.. once the pension pot has gone, what then ?

    I'm very suspicious of what the government is planning to do. There will be very many people who will squander the money and be left with nothing, rather than having a regular sum every month. What will be the point of saving for a pension if you are going to spend the money as soon as you retire?

    Perhaps it's also a ruse to get people to fund their care from their pension money if it is the only asset they have?

    It's also a concern that people who do not want to take out money from their pension may be forced to do so by unscrupulous companies.
  • torbrex
    torbrex Posts: 71,340 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker Rampant Recycler Hung up my suit!
    The rule changes make it easier to move your pension pot into a drawdown which in my opinion is better for those of us with smaller pots. If I were forced to purchase an annuity, it would be a pittance of an income and I would be forced to work for longer, possibly even past my normal retirement age.
    The new rules will allow me to draw an income from my pot that will actually allow me to retire early.
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Sapphire wrote: »
    Perhaps it's also a ruse to get people to fund their care from their pension money if it is the only asset they have?

    Good.
    Sapphire wrote: »
    It's also a concern that people who do not want to take out money from their pension may be forced to do so by unscrupulous companies.

    "forced"? How?
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • Sapphire
    Sapphire Posts: 4,269 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Debt-free and Proud!
    Good.

    Why? Many people have worked for 50 years or more and their pensions have been very hard won – and are certainly not 'gold plated' in many cases, despite what hostile whiners in the national press, etc, would have you believe. One good thing, I suppose, in such a scenario, would be that their heirs would not inherit and would be forced to work hard to achieve a decent retirement.:D

    "forced"? How?

    By relaxations in the law, if it is not properly enacted.
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Sapphire wrote: »
    Good.

    Why? Many people have worked for 50 years or more and their pensions have been very hard won – and are certainly not 'gold plated' in many cases, despite what hostile whiners in the national press, etc, would have you believe. One good thing, I suppose, in such a scenario, would be that their heirs would not inherit and would be forced to work hard to achieve a decent retirement.:D

    Because that is what saving is for, to see you to the grave in comfort. What's your alternative, to sponge off the taxpayer?
    Sapphire wrote: »
    "forced"? How?

    By relaxations in the law, if it is not properly enacted.

    Oh rubbish.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • dunroving
    dunroving Posts: 1,903 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    My understanding is that under the current/previous rules, drawing down a pension was complicated. I have a friend who has a decent pension pot who does not want to purchase an annuity. She would like to first take her 25% tax-free lump and invest in ISAs, etc., and then gradually draw down the remainder, hoping she doesn't run out money before she runs out of life(!)

    It still seems pretty unclear how straightforward it will be to withdraw periodic amounts from a pension fund, but I have read several promises that the government will provide guidance on how this will be done. April is pretty close but I still haven't seen anything. Anyone have any clues how easy it will be to draw income from a pension pot following the rule changes? For example, if my friend's boiler blows up will she simply be able to contact Aviva and ask for £3,000 from her pension pot to buy a new one? She is 63 and on state pension.
    (Nearly) dunroving
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,803 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    My understanding is that under the current/previous rules, drawing down a pension was complicated.

    No different to the changed method except there were caps before.
    She would like to first take her 25% tax-free lump and invest in ISAs, etc.

    Currently, the pension is invested tax free and outside of the estate. Why take it out of the pension if it is not needed?
    and then gradually draw down the remainder, hoping she doesn't run out money before she runs out of life(!)

    So, maybe doing the phased drawdown method would be better (assuming she can afford the risks)
    It still seems pretty unclear how straightforward it will be to withdraw periodic amounts from a pension fund, but I have read several promises that the government will provide guidance on how this will be done.

    There will be no guidance on how this is done. That is for the product providers to decide. However, it will likely be similar to how phased drawdown is done currently except with an auto monthly payment facility.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.