We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Loan terms help

2»

Comments

  • Asl77c
    Asl77c Posts: 87 Forumite
    With hindsight might it not have been better for the OP to have used the money paid back early to build up a savings pots for emergencies?
    He could apply for a new loan to repay the old one over a longer period to reduce the monthly payment.

    Thanks for your input there. I am financially stable and the money paying back was extra not doing anything. I have been able to buy my first house, fund my wedding among other things whilst making these payments so that wasn't the issue with the question although i appreciate the sentiment.

    On an interesting note, having telephoned Nattiest for further discussions it has become apparent that although i have overpaid, it hasn't reduced the term of the loan and has actually reduced the monthly payments, however as i have a standing order set up rather than DD my payment stays the same.

    Added to the confusion, the payment that they say i should be making monthly for the duration of the remaining 55 months, if i were to pay it i would actually end up paying back over double the remaining balance. Essentially its a massive mess and they have referred it to an investigation team to find out what the hell is going on lol :rotfl:
  • Asl77c
    Asl77c Posts: 87 Forumite
    Just had a thought, being that through this whole thing, it seems that my term has not been reduced with my additional payments. As it is set out in my T&C that i signed that unless the bank received in writing that i wished for the monthly payments to decrease, it would automatically reduce the term, does this therefore mean that they have violated the terms of the contract by instead reducing the monthly payments - I never actually physically reduced the payments as i was paying by standing order not DD so the payments for myself have always remained the same. This is just a point of query, have they violated the terms of the contract?
  • ViolaLass
    ViolaLass Posts: 5,764 Forumite
    You said in the OP that the term had been reduced but you would rather reduce the payments, which they would not let you do. You then later say that the term has not changed and the payments have reduced.

    Which is it?
  • Gaz83
    Gaz83 Posts: 4,047 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    More holes than a block of Swiss cheese.
    "Facism arrives as your friend. It will restore your honour, make you feel proud, protect your house, give you a job, clean up the neighbourhood, remind you of how great you once were, clear out the venal and the corrupt, remove anything you feel is unlike you... [it] doesn't walk in saying, "our programme means militias, mass imprisonments, transportations, war and persecution."
  • Apples2
    Apples2 Posts: 6,442 Forumite
    Hey. I actually work in the field of business financing. If you'd like to speak further, shoot me an e-mail SAMMYTHESCAMMINGTHIEF@GMAIL.COM

    I'll let you know what your options are and, hopefully, we'll find something that matches your needs. Let me know. Take care.

    Clown........:rotfl:
  • Asl77c
    Asl77c Posts: 87 Forumite
    ViolaLass wrote: »
    You said in the OP that the term had been reduced but you would rather reduce the payments, which they would not let you do. You then later say that the term has not changed and the payments have reduced.

    Which is it?
    Gaz83 wrote: »
    More holes than a block of Swiss cheese.

    Yes i know what i said, I would rather have the amounts reduced now as it suits me. My point is banks are quick enough to try and get all the money back if we as the consumer break the terms and conditions. I wanted to find out from a curiosity standpoint could there be a viable way out of the remainder of the loan due to their inability to follow the terms and conditions set out in their document. Also i did say that the payments have reduced, but this is not in line with what i have paid off, this would amount to me paying back double the remainder what i owe so as such something has gone wrong there. Its a major balls up on their end and does it give a get out on the remainder. I have no issues in paying what i owe, but as i said they are quick enough to come down on us for messing up, does this work in my favour?

    Hopefully that clears that up...
  • If you think they will write the debt off in any way you are barking up the wrong tree.
  • Asl77c
    Asl77c Posts: 87 Forumite
    If you think they will write the debt off in any way you are barking up the wrong tree.

    Thanks! I didn't really think it was anything feasible but thought this was the right place to ask. Not long to pay it off now and more than manageable. Thanks to all for your input, i know where to come for help in future. :)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178K Life & Family
  • 260.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.