We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Portfolio Value of a DB Scheme

My wife and I are both in the LGPS and in addition I have a deferred DB pension from a previous employer, we are both about 55.

Assuming we left the LGPS scheme now, at 65 they would pay out:

Me - £8.5k pa

Wife - £11k pa, with an AVC pot alongside this that should provide the TFLS without commuting any of the LGPS pension.

Plus my deferred scheme will pay out £9k at age 60.


We are now setting up a SIPP for my wife (HR taxpayer) and an ISA. The investments into these are all equities i.e. no Bonds which makes it appear that we are overweight in "risky" investments by what seems to be conventional wisdom.

Our logic here is that the DB schemes are providing the "safe" returns so we can accept a higher risk level.


Does that make sense as a strategy and, how do I value the DB pots to assess where we are in terms of overall allocation profile?

I have read 16x or 20x Annual Pension as the rule of thumb but that sounds low to me.


Thanks

Comments

  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    AlanP wrote: »
    Does that make sense as a strategy and, how do I value the DB pots to assess where we are in terms of overall allocation profile?

    Yes; either ask them what the transfer value is or perhaps just use the yield on long-dated index-linked gilts to convert the annual pension into an equivalent capital sum. For instance, the 2037 is yielding 0.78% p.a. below RPI inflation at the moment, which is itself 2.3% p.a. So 1.5% p.a. => roughly multiply by 60. You might then want to haul a bit off to allow for the fact that it's some years before you'll get the pensions, and another bit off assuming that ILG yields might well have risen before then, but it still implies to me that 40x might be a better approximation that 20x or 30x.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • davide691
    davide691 Posts: 71 Forumite
    edited 16 December 2014 at 1:58PM
    I would multiply the combined annual pension by say 35. I have just had a public sector pension transfer value and it is 40 times the annual pension, but mine pays out at 60. For asset allocation, I would classify that all as index-linked gilts.

    For SIPP and ISA, as well as equities, there are a bunch of other asset classes worth considering - e.g., non-index-linked bonds, commodities, real estate, private equity, etc
  • atush
    atush Posts: 18,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    for every 3.5K of indexed income, say a value of 100K?
  • Koicarp
    Koicarp Posts: 323 Forumite
    My NHS report says "hypothetical fund" of £310k for £8.6k annual pension
  • AlanP_2
    AlanP_2 Posts: 3,545 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    So a factor of between 28 and 40 seems to be the consensus so going with 35 should give me a reasonable estimate to plan with.


    Thanks
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.7K Life & Family
  • 259.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.