We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
MSE News: First-time buyers to get 20% discount on 'starter homes'
Comments
-
Sigh. Another pointless scheme. They are in danger of sounding as ad-hoc as labour used to be. A scheme for every special interest group, which we all end up paying for directly or indirectly.
If schemes like these are needed, it is clear there is a structural problem, which requires structural reform.
The main reason house prices are structurally expensive is the artificial land shortage created by a planning system that is as tight as a mouse's ....
The conservatives have made some progress on this, but I guess the worst sort of politics comes out prior to elections.0 -
-
Does anyone know when I can register for this scheme? Thanks0
-
I am 26 and not a FTB anymore...however I still think it's unfair to restrict age limit at 40.
Over 40 and FTB should have been their first priority!
just my 2pence...
I am 38 now but economically I am closer to 28 because I took a career change, returned to university and was part of the graduate year that experienced the effects of the crash. It is a blunt instrument to assume that all 40+ benefited from Right to Buy, Buy to Let and fake property prices.
Having said all that, at my age I need to consider this scheme, especially during the election year closing down sale. I may never get another chance.0 -
Another intervention to keep the housing bubble going. I wish they would stop all these housing interventions which are marketed at helping first time buyers but in reality and bungs of cash to the builders who fund the conservative party. We need a free market so house prices can find a natural level, not propped up.
I hope this scheme is stopped, why give tax payer bungs to builders when police, ambulance, fire service budget cuts are destroying them.:exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.
Save our Savers
0 -
Looks like it's being funded by developers not tax payers. So instead of providing 30% affordable homes or paying CIL / S106 money to the council they can opt to give a discount to FTB instead.
Will buyer B be required to pay back any money to buyer A a few years down the line when they sell for an unearned extra profit?Been away for a while.0 -
Running_Horse wrote: »
Will buyer B be required to pay back any money to buyer A a few years down the line when they sell for an unearned extra profit?Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.0 -
Can anyone explain this quote to me?
Communities Secretary Eric Pickles adds: "The 2008 housing crash blocked millions of hard-working, creditworthy people from becoming home owners, at a time in their lives when they should have been able to expect to get on the property ladder
Surely the housing crash was the best thing to happen to people trying to buy a house??
I cannot believe we have another scheme to keep house prices rising and people in mountains of debt!0 -
Is there a link to some place where I can put my name down as an interested wannabe FTB?0
-
Looks like it's being funded by developers not tax payers. So instead of providing 30% affordable homes or paying CIL / S106 money to the council
So it is being funded by the tax payer.. CIL is basically a tax, if they dont pay it, the money has to come from somewhere else. The developer will NEVER pay for this scheme. It will always be the tax payer / over valuation scam.Collect your reward :j
V0xOT09PV1RFR0FFTUNFQkUyRURFVU5VQU9JQUNSTU9JMFIxTE9ZUllSWUJOSEtQRURTWCU=0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards