We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MILLIONS of Young People WANT & NEED Higher House prices!!!

1246714

Comments

  • MARTYM8`
    MARTYM8` Posts: 1,212 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    thequant wrote: »
    Dispels the myth that increasing house prices are bad for our younger generation.

    As has been pointed out - that only applies if they are financially illiterate

    You currently own a flat which cost £150,000. Prices double - and its now worth £300,000. Wow - quids in.

    But you have kids and now need a house. That house used to cost £300k - now its £600k.

    So instead of needing to find another £150k to buy your family home you now need £300k. So in that sense they are £150k WORSE OFF.

    Presumably who ever wrote this article failed GCSE Maths?!:D
  • MARTYM8` wrote: »
    As has been pointed out - that only applies if they are financially illiterate

    You currently own a flat which cost £150,000. Prices double - and its now worth £300,000. Wow - quids in.

    But you have kids and now need a house. That house used to cost £300k - now its £600k.

    So instead of needing to find another £150k to buy your family home you now need £300k. So in that sense they are £150k WORSE OFF.

    Presumably who ever wrote this article failed GCSE Maths?!:D

    This is why we need our government to step in and do something to prevent house price inflation above that of general inflation.

    For a start restricting non UK residents from buying places to rent out as an investment. Our homes should not be on the global commodity market. Exposing our homes to global pressures when it is evidently an unarguably not matching demand is negligent by our government.

    We need many things in place to promote and support house building, NOT more house inflation.

    We need things in place to keep house price inflation inline with general inflation, ideally wage inflation only.

    We need demand managed by controlling the level of investment from over seas.
    Peace.
  • Also,

    Can somebody explain quickly and simply why repayment mortgages do not spread the interest evenly across the term?

    It seems a bit unfair to me.
    Peace.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Also,

    Can somebody explain quickly and simply why repayment mortgages do not spread the interest evenly across the term?

    It seems a bit unfair to me.



    because maths isn't fair : it's a matter of maths


    interest per month = capital owed x annual interest rate /12


    as the capital owing decreases over the term of the mortgage the interest paid each month decreases too.


    bigger amounts attract more interest than smaller amounts
    (just like saving accounts too)


    It explains a lot about your posts.
  • stator
    stator Posts: 7,441 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Also,

    Can somebody explain quickly and simply why repayment mortgages do not spread the interest evenly across the term?

    It seems a bit unfair to me.

    Because that would only work if you never switched mortgages. On mortgage you've lent someone say £100,000 you'd want say £5,000 interest in year 1 + £5,000 repayment per year, but as the loan is repayed the interest would decrease, in the second year they only owe you £95,000 so the interest would be £4,900 in the second year. The average interest would be £2,500 over the life of the mortgage.

    If under your system you spread the interest evenly over a 30 year mortgage and the customer switched after 5 years, they've only paid £2,500 * 5 when they should have paid £5,000 in the first year and £4,900 in the second year, £4,800 in the third etc etc, quite a big difference.

    Don't bother correcting my figures, they're made up illustrative numbers, you get the idea ;)
    Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    Also,

    Can somebody explain quickly and simply why repayment mortgages do not spread the interest evenly across the term?

    It seems a bit unfair to me.

    The clue is in the word REPAYMENT

    As you repay the mortgage, the amount owed decreases and therefore the interest charged on the amount outstanding also decreases.

    When the interest rate changes, the amount of interest charged also changes.

    You cannot calculate the interest to be charged on a 25 or 30 year mortgage, as you do not know at the start what the interest rate will be throughout the term (unless fixed for the entire term)

    It is not a particularly complicated concept.
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    Can somebody explain quickly and simply why repayment mortgages do not spread the interest evenly across the term?

    Those who understand compound interest are destined to collect it. Those who don't are doomed to pay it - apparently attributed to Albert Einstein.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    wotsthat wrote: »
    Those who understand compound interest are destined to collect it. Those who don't are doomed to pay it - apparently attributed to Albert Einstein.



    I like the sentiment but for mortgages there is no compound interest as all the interest accrued is paid in full each month, plus a bit of capital (for repayment mortgages).
    Einstein was wrong about a lot of things.
  • LydiaJ
    LydiaJ Posts: 8,083 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker Mortgage-free Glee!
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    I like the sentiment but for mortgages there is no compound interest as all the interest accrued is paid in full each month, plus a bit of capital (for repayment mortgages).
    Einstein was wrong about a lot of things.

    Understanding why the monthly interest payable on your mortgage decreases over the term is pretty much the same piece of maths as understanding compound interest. I doubt there's anybody out there who understands compound interest and doesn't understand why a repayment mortgage doesn't spread the interest burden evenly over the term.

    Oh, and some people have mortgages where the interest is added to the balance daily, and payments are only paid monthly, so there is a small element of compound interest as the month goes by before the next payment.
    Do you know anyone who's bereaved? Point them to https://www.AtaLoss.org which does for bereavement support what MSE does for financial services, providing links to support organisations relevant to the circumstances of the loss & the local area. (Link permitted by forum team)
    Tyre performance in the wet deteriorates rapidly below about 3mm tread - change yours when they get dangerous, not just when they are nearly illegal (1.6mm).
    Oh, and wear your seatbelt. My kids are only alive because they were wearing theirs when somebody else was driving in wet weather with worn tyres.
    :)
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    I like the sentiment but for mortgages there is no compound interest as all the interest accrued is paid in full each month, plus a bit of capital (for repayment mortgages).
    Einstein was wrong about a lot of things.

    I think Mr. Einstein might accuse you of being a bit of a nit picker and confusing Tickers even further for no good reason.

    Paying off the accrued interest each month doesn't alter the fact that we're looking at an obvious effect of compounding. Try working out a monthly payment to clear a mortgage without exponentiating the interest rate in the calculation.

    That's why, as Tickers asked, mortgage debt doesn't fall in a linear fashion - that bit of capital paid increases by just a little bit more each month - exponentially in fact.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.