We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Stamp Duty Changes

1356

Comments

  • Generali wrote: »
    Economic theory says that the benefits will be split between buyers and sellers FWIW. Prices will rise a bit but by less than the tax cut.

    yeah, dunno, i mean, that's right in general for taxes on buying but i suppose this stamp duty cut doesn't just reduce the effective price a very small %, it also reduces the up front cash requirement [i.e. deposit+fees+taxes] by an actually non-trivial amount. if it the deposit requirement that was mostly binding then it's possible that the impact on demand could be a lot more than implied by say a £5k saving on a £260k house.
    FACT.
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    Generali wrote: »
    Economic theory says that the benefits will be split between buyers and sellers FWIW. Prices will rise a bit but by less than the tax cut.

    Well that's you out of the running for the Editorship of the Express.
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • chewmylegoff
    chewmylegoff Posts: 11,469 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Yes, I do realise that.

    But the point at which these changes help you is when you are a homebuyer, not a homeowner.

    The BBC has even gone as far as suggesting up to 22m homeowners could be better off as a result of this change.

    If you want to get into semantics, the tax is payable at the same time that the property is transferred into your name and are hence a homeowner (and certainly by the time your solicitor transfers the cash to the revenue you are a homeowner) but in any case it also helps anyone trying to sell their house (and that person will likely be buying another one) as the buyer has to raise less money to buy the house and it prevents prices stalling at the incremental points. If you own a house which is "worth" 250-275k it helps you very much, for instance.
  • The new SD system is a system that will lead to more house price inflation compared to the slab system. Is this a responsible thing to do considering the state of the housing market?

    Has the current government done anything to stop high house price inflation? It seems every action and policy is leading to a higher likelihood for more and quicker inflation?
    Peace.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The new SD system is a system that will lead to more house price inflation compared to the slab system. Is this a responsible thing to do considering the state of the housing market?

    Has the current government done anything to stop high house price inflation? It seems every action and policy is leading to a higher likelihood for more and quicker inflation?

    Yes because it could help increase transaction and whether it will lead to more house price inflation is debatable.
  • ukcarper wrote: »
    Yes because it could help increase transaction and whether it will lead to more house price inflation is debatable.
    The former Stamp Duty cliff edges helped to keep prices down. Very few properties would sell for £255K or £510 so this limited prices of properties which weren't quite as good as those priced bang on the thresholds.


    I would imagine that this change is likely to bring about a rise of 2% to 3% in property prices all down the line from £500K.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The former Stamp Duty cliff edges helped to keep prices down. Very few properties would sell for £255K or £510 so this limited prices of properties which weren't quite as good as those priced bang on the thresholds.


    I would imagine that this change is likely to bring about a rise of 2% to 3% in property prices all down the line from £500K.

    I'm not sure that's right it will increase the prices of some properties around the thresholds but further above thresholds the price already reflects the value.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    yeah, dunno, i mean, that's right in general for taxes on buying but i suppose this stamp duty cut doesn't just reduce the effective price a very small %, it also reduces the up front cash requirement [i.e. deposit+fees+taxes] by an actually non-trivial amount. if it the deposit requirement that was mostly binding then it's possible that the impact on demand could be a lot more than implied by say a £5k saving on a £260k house.

    I take your point but actually most of the changes are trivial. £5,000 on a £260,000 is non-trivial but is also not a typical FTB house (the sort where SDLT is most important) and also at one of the price points that will see the largest savings.

    This is a good change to a bad tax but lets not turn it into something it's not.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The new SD system is a system that will lead to more house price inflation compared to the slab system. Is this a responsible thing to do considering the state of the housing market?

    Has the current government done anything to stop high house price inflation? It seems every action and policy is leading to a higher likelihood for more and quicker inflation?

    Interesting use of the word "will". Is that a new definition of will, will=might in my opinion?
  • Generali wrote: »
    This is a good change to a bad tax

    Or a bad change to a very good tax (one of the most cost effective and efficient to collect, and very straightforward to understand).


    In my opinion the chancellor should have left well alone other than to increase the rates on the most expensive properties.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.