We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

To cap it all ......SIPPS.

http://www.professionaladviser.com/professional-adviser/opinion/2383735/why-labour-is-right-to-threaten-a-cap-on-drawdown-fees

"But there remain dark pools where the light of reform has not shone, and the management of much of the money currently being drawn from self-invested personal pensions (SIPPs) is the darkest.
It is quite common to find layers of fees being charged to member accounts that reduce the capital reservoir by 4% a year.
The maximum Government Actuary's Department (GAD) limit for a 65 year old is around 5.5%. Even taking into account the charges built into GAD numbers, many SIPPs are creaming off in charges well over half the income that can be safely be paid to SIPP holders...."

"charges built into GAD numbers," - what does this mean?

Comments

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.