We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

25/75 Equity Scheme - Mortgage lender questions

Hi,

I had a 3 year fixed mortgage with Halifax starting from June2008, it was set at 6.19% borrowing approx £97,000, it has since gone onto the SVR of 3.5% and then 3.99% in recent times. The mortgage was based on a 25% shared equity scheme with the builder (purchase price of £130,000) so they loaned me £32,000 towards the mortgage.

Looking back at me mortgage details and having spoken to Halifax they have given me a 100% mortgage scheme on £97,000 rather than a 75% mortgage on £130,000... In my eyes this is incorrect as I should have been offered a better interest rate for having the 25% deposit rather than nothing.

I have logged the issues and it can take 2 weeks for them to reply. Could anyone help me if they come back and argue against the case? Would anyone have any details on Halifax rates back in 2008 based on a 75% mortgage.

I feel that they owe me money for charging me the wrong rate. I have paid off virtually nothing due to it being a 100% mortgage and have since stayed on the SVR because I don't have the equity to start a new product, where as actually I do!

Many thanks.

Comments

  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    What deposit? You injected no cash.
  • The builder injected the deposit (£32,000) but Halifax put this to one side and then set up a 100% mortgage for the remaining amount. So rather than have a better rate and initial amount paid off I was stuck with a higher fixed rate and paying off a heavy amount of interest for the past 5 years.
  • amnblog
    amnblog Posts: 12,761 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The builder did not 'inject the deposit' they retained 25% of the value of the property.


    You should read through your initial paperwork from the purchase once again.
    I am a Mortgage Broker

    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Broker, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    ... I have paid off virtually nothing due to it being a 100% mortgage and have since stayed on the SVR because I don't have the equity to start a new product, where as actually I do!.....

    I think you have misunderstood. You don't have any equity in the property. The builder does. That's what 'shared equity' means.

    Where you to sell the property today, the builder would get 25% of the proceeds and you'd get to keep the rest. That 25% is not some gift; the builder will expect to get it back sometime.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.