MSE News: People over 40 'denied mortgages'

New research suggests homebuyers over 40 are being denied mortgages because they will retire before the term is up ...
Read the full story:

People over 40 'denied mortgages'

OfficialStamp.gif


Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
«134567

Comments

  • Is this really news?

    Why should someone be able to borrow into retirement if they can't prove their retirement income will be sufficient?!

    First people moan about borrowers taking advantage of self-certified, interest-only, lending to retirement mortgages pre-2008, and now the same people moan about responsible lending practices.

    The mind boggles.
    I am a mortgage adviser.
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • lemontart
    lemontart Posts: 6,037 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I do find this odd in a way having gotten a mortgage 3 years ago at 50 but took it out for 15 years and I know several others my age group that have done similar
    I am responsible me, myself and I alone I am not the keeper others thoughts and words.
  • James_B.
    James_B. Posts: 404 Forumite
    "Being denied". Yet more emotive language from a site that seems determined to encourage people to take on debts that they can't afford, then blame the banks when it all goes wrong.

    I honestly believe that the journalists and moderators here must have morals so out of line with decent society that I'm surprised that they can function in it.
  • zerog
    zerog Posts: 2,478 Forumite
    I thought that nobody was going to be able to afford a deposit until they were 40 anyway... at least if they want to buy in London.
  • Good grief, I'm 42 in January and just applied to Santander - should I have asked for a 23 year mortgage?

    Anyone had experience of this recently?
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    Good news imo.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Good grief, I'm 42 in January and just applied to Santander - should I have asked for a 23 year mortgage?

    Anyone had experience of this recently?

    Won't you retire at 67? ;)
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Is this really news?

    Why should someone be able to borrow into retirement if they can't prove their retirement income will be sufficient?!

    First people moan about borrowers taking advantage of self-certified, interest-only, lending to retirement mortgages pre-2008, and now the same people moan about responsible lending practices.

    The mind boggles.

    Standard of financial journalism reaches new lows. Appears that everyone is becoming a debt junkie. Yet to cure the ills of the past. Culture has to change.
  • amnblog
    amnblog Posts: 12,690 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Anyone who thinks this is not a problem has had their head up their bottom.


    The days of taking a mortgage in your twenties and paying it off steady, in full, over 25 years are long gone.
    I am a Mortgage Broker

    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Broker, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • tizerbelle
    tizerbelle Posts: 1,921 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Aren't they aware that the default retirement age of 65 was scrapped 3 years ago? Very few jobs now are allowed to retire you at 65 (or whatever their usual retirement age is) so you can, should you wish, carry on working until you keel over - assuming they don't sack you for capability reasons before that date!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.