We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Two real pension eye openers
Comments
-
greenglide wrote: »So if they are forcing the trivial commutation lump sum on members how do they know that the members have less than £30,000 across all registered schemes?
Within the last few days the government have 'relaxed' the rules re taking advice on tranfers from April:
http://www.corporate-adviser.com/news-and-analysis/latest-news/db-transfer-advice-rules-relaxed/2018132.article
The government is relaxing the rules around requiring advice for DB to DC transfers, with the threshold to be applied on a per pension basis rather than on a total benefits basis.
Lord Newby said: “In response to feedback from stakeholders, we have decided that [the £30,000 threshold] should apply only to safeguarded benefits in the scheme from which the member intends to transfer, and be calculated on the basis of the cash equivalent transfer value, which is the standard measure in the industry.”
The Towers Watson article referenced by hugheskevi also contains this gem:
http://www.towerswatson.com/en-GB/Insights/Newsletters/Europe/UK-Corporate-and-Trustee-Briefing/2014/06/Budget-2014-increases-to-trivial-commutation-limits
For the small lump sums of £10,000, this is simply a case of looking at the value of the benefits in your scheme. The number of members affected will depend upon the terms which are used to convert pensions into lump sums. The less generous the terms, the larger the number of eligible members will be and the larger the savings in the scheme.
Cue more "stakeholders" downgrading values to below the £30,000 limit where financial advice is required?
Or am I just being cynical?
WW0 -
Eye-opener no.2: There is a pensions trap here nobody is talking about. If you are expecting only a modest income from a company or personal pension, currently it's not worth it.
Yes, and this is partly behind the move to the single tier state pension. With this means testing removed, even those who only put tiny amounts aside for their old age will benefit.
Of course, the hope is that people will start planning properly for retirement and saving significant sums, but I doubt that will happen.I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.
Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.0 -
Of course, the hope is that people will start planning properly for retirement and saving significant sums, but I doubt that will happen.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards