We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Total Debt as a Proportion of GDP

123457»

Comments

  • danothy
    danothy Posts: 2,200 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Generali wrote: »
    Nah. If I was cleverer I'd be richerer.

    How damning, I'm quite poor, relatively speaking.
    If you think of it as 'us' verses 'them', then it's probably your side that are the villains.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 21 November 2014 at 1:34PM
    danothy wrote: »
    How damning, I'm quite poor, relatively speaking.

    I don't mean it to be.

    I look at poverty on a global not local level: if you live in a house you haven't built yourself from what you can scrounge and eat other than rice with lentils and spices every day then you're already in the top 80% or so.

    If you can afford secondary education for your son that probably puts you in the top 50%, affording secondary education for daughters puts you in the top 40% at a guess (not morally correct but accurate).

    The treatment I've had is probably available to the top world 10% at most. I'd doubt if all of my continuing treatment is available on the NHS for example which takes out a chunk of the richest people with ok healthcare.
  • danothy
    danothy Posts: 2,200 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Generali wrote: »
    I don't mean it to be.

    I look at poverty on a global not local level: if you live in a house you haven't built yourself from what you can scrounge and eat other than rice with lentils and spices every day then you're already in the top 80% or so.

    If you can afford secondary education for your son that probably puts you in the top 50%, affording secondary education for daughters puts you in the top 40% at a guess (not morally correct but accurate).

    The treatment I've had is probably available to the top world 10% at most. I'd doubt if all of my continuing treatment is available on the NHS for example which takes out a chunk of the richest people with ok healthcare.

    I'm aware of that in global terms, and make specific note of the apparent prioritising of money to educate sons rather than daughters (hideous). However, in the frame of the UK, if being clevererer equates to being richerer then I have to come to terms with being sub average :(
    If you think of it as 'us' verses 'them', then it's probably your side that are the villains.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.