We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Will pensions changes lead to criminals taking advantage?
Comments
-
What will the response be if I blow the lot and then ask for state benefits to see me out?0
-
What will the response be if I blow the lot and then ask for state benefits to see me out?
Pension credits are being abolished as part of the new state pension.
It will be interesting to see whether benefits agencies treat massive erosion of pension funds as deprivation of assets.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Pension credits are being abolished as part of the new state pension.
The difference is that the nSP standard amount is to be more than the PC guaranteed single amount so the majority of people won't qualify. People who have less than the full amount of nSP will get PC subject to the means test.0 -
...It will be interesting to see whether benefits agencies treat massive erosion of pension funds as deprivation of assets.
Interesting question.
Of course, the value of someone's pension fund is disregarded when assessing how much capital they have for the purposes of means testing. So I'm not certain whether anyone could be held culpable of depriving themselves of an asset that was specifically excluded from consideration in the first place.
But I see what you mean. Someone could cash in their pension fund, blow a lot of it on booze, drugs, and women (or men), fritter away the rest on non-essentials, and then present themselves to the authorities as destitute.
I have no idea what is intended to be done in such circumstances.0 -
blow a lot of it on booze, drugs, and women (or men), fritter away the rest on non-essentials
Interesting:)0 -
greenglide wrote: »Pensions Credit will still exist under nSP.
The difference is that the nSP standard amount is to be more than the PC guaranteed single amount so the majority of people won't qualify. People who have less than the full amount of nSP will get PC subject to the means test.
They'll also presumably be eligible for local housing allowance / housing benefit if in rented accomodation and possbily council tax subsidies0 -
greenglide wrote: »So booze, drugs and women (or men) are "essentials"?
Interesting:)
I think antrobus is paraphrasing George Best, who famously said "I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered."
Probably before your time.....0 -
Probably before your time.....
I dearly wish it was before my time, but it wasn't.
Failing memory is my only excuse and that is an age thing .................0 -
Yes you can. When the new state pension comes in, there wont be pension credits. So, if you blow your money, it is only your own lifestyle you are causing a problem with.
Sensible people will do that.
Its a good idea. If someone saved all their life into S&S ISAs, they would not have these restrictions. So, why with pensions?
Fair point. I hadn't thought of that. Presumably funding the world cruise and Ferrari by using your Pension Fund would be classed as deprivation of capital as it would be if the individual spent all their ISA money on a similar thing and then tried to claim State Benefits because they had no money left.(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
Interesting question.
Of course, the value of someone's pension fund is disregarded when assessing how much capital they have for the purposes of means testing. So I'm not certain whether anyone could be held culpable of depriving themselves of an asset that was specifically excluded from consideration in the first place.
But I see what you mean. Someone could cash in their pension fund, blow a lot of it on booze, drugs, and women (or men), fritter away the rest on non-essentials, and then present themselves to the authorities as destitute.
I have no idea what is intended to be done in such circumstances.
The deprivation of assets surely isnt the extraction of the full pension pot, rather the expenditure on the Ferrari. After extraction the cash becomes a normal asset treated in the same way as any other cash savings.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards