We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MSE News: Pension inheritance tax to be axed

Options
123468

Comments

  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,448 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    dunstonh wrote: »
    And how does that compare with a savings account which would have capital erosion or an investment that could have capital erosion.
    Investments don't claim to provide "a guaranteed income for life". My point is that annuities don't either, in real terms. So the main selling point of annuities, the "guarantee", is no guarantee that your income won't fall significantly in real terms.

    Search this forum for "inflation risk". A lot has been written about it. Much by you ;)
  • Aegis
    Aegis Posts: 5,695 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    zagfles wrote: »
    Investments don't claim to provide "a guaranteed income for life". My point is that annuities don't either, in real terms. So the main selling point of annuities, the "guarantee", is no guarantee that your income won't fall significantly in real terms.

    Search this forum for "inflation risk". A lot has been written about it. Much by you ;)
    Well, you can buy an annuity with inflation-proofing if you like. It costs (of course), but it's doable.
    I am a Chartered Financial Planner
    Anything I say on the forum is for discussion purposes only and should not be construed as personal financial advice. It is vitally important to do your own research before acting on information gathered from any users on this forum.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,448 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    Aegis wrote: »
    Well, you can buy an annuity with inflation-proofing if you like. It costs (of course), but it's doable.
    Indeed. But you wouldn't get it at 6%. Well, not unless you waited till 75+ to buy it. At 60 you'd be doing well to get 3%. Unless you have short life expectancy etc.
  • Aegis
    Aegis Posts: 5,695 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    zagfles wrote: »
    Indeed. But you wouldn't get it at 6%. Well, not unless you waited till 75+ to buy it. At 60 you'd be doing well to get 3%. Unless you have short life expectancy etc.
    True, annuities are still suffering because of the current bond yields.
    I am a Chartered Financial Planner
    Anything I say on the forum is for discussion purposes only and should not be construed as personal financial advice. It is vitally important to do your own research before acting on information gathered from any users on this forum.
  • bmm78
    bmm78 Posts: 423 Forumite
    People concerned about inflation risk on annuities should probably be looking at asset-backed annuities first, and weighing up the risks/volatility along with capacity for loss.

    It's very difficult to get value on escalating annuities.
    I work for a financial services intermediary specialising in the at-retirement market. I am not a financial adviser, and any comments represent my opinion only and should not be construed as advice or a recommendation
  • System
    System Posts: 178,349 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    If a pension pot can now be paid out under drawdown in any amounts you wish, from monthly payments spread over a lifetime to cashing in the lot in one go, then what exactly is a "lump sum" ?

    99.99% of the pot would be drawdown at the marginal rate, but 100% would be taxed at 45% ?
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Your_Hero
    Your_Hero Posts: 883 Forumite
    If a pension pot can now be paid out under drawdown in any amounts you wish, from monthly payments spread over a lifetime to cashing in the lot in one go, then what exactly is a "lump sum" ?

    99.99% of the pot would be drawdown at the marginal rate, but 100% would be taxed at 45% ?
    25% of your pot is tax-free.
    Stephen Covey once said that "when you teach once, you learn twice". That is the primary reason for my participation on the forums as an IFA.

    Although I strive to provide accurate information in my posts, there may be the odd time when I fail. Yes I know it's hard to believe but even Your Hero can make mistakes. Apologies in advance.
  • Pincher
    Pincher Posts: 6,552 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    zagfles wrote: »
    Investments don't claim to provide "a guaranteed income for life". My point is that annuities don't either, in real terms. So the main selling point of annuities, the "guarantee", is no guarantee that your income won't fall significantly in real terms.

    Search this forum for "inflation risk". A lot has been written about it. Much by you ;)


    I wonder how smug people were when they bought an Equitable Life pension with a 13% guaranteed annuity rate?


    There is now a new way to enforce their Terms & Condition. Find the crazy American judge who says Argentina should pay full value to the hedge fund(s) who bought Argentinian bonds on the cheap when Argentina economy went pop.


    Amusingly, around that time, I actually bumped into somebody who was virtually homeless, but was working in a rent-a-office, working on commission only. He insists that he could easily make £10k on a deal, if he manages to find somebody who will buy Argentinian bonds. Apparently, he did make £5k several months ago, hence his inability to pay rent and has to crash with friends.


    Another believer in impossible dreams.
  • MRMX9
    MRMX9 Posts: 86 Forumite
    The socialist will always be upset that individuals are permitted to keep their own savings.

    Just an observation - but in this instance the individual will be dead. Its their kids and grandkids that will get their savings pot - potentially tax free.

    By contrast someone leaving a house or cash in a savings account pays inheritance tax on the full amount over the IHT limits.

    I merely ask why pension pots should be treated differently - is it because the sons and daughters of the mega wealthy tend to have big pension pots whereas ordinary joes tend not to?

    PS Not sure why the kids and grandkids of pension savers should be more deserving of keeping their parents/grandparents pension pots tax free than a cleaner on £15k is of her earnings?
  • mgdavid
    mgdavid Posts: 6,710 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The cleaner on 15k will not pay any income tax at all by the end of the next Parliament - unless Milliband / Balls are in charge.
    The questions that get the best answers are the questions that give most detail....
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.