📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

ELITE 11+ Awaiting glitches and chatting with friends

1301302304306307978

Comments

  • Tinyshoes
    Tinyshoes Posts: 29,014 Forumite
    zippydooda wrote: »
    is it still your screen saver :p

    Don't you mean my wallpaper? :rotfl:
  • Savvybuyer
    Savvybuyer Posts: 22,332 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 28 September 2014 at 8:52PM
    "Changing setting our prices" - find out more. Okay...

    "We're rolling out lower regular prices on 1000s of everyday products so that you won't have to wait for a deal to get a good price. Alongside this, we'll continue to offer you value through our Brand Match scheme and you can trust the values behind our own label range."

    Hmmm... but not if T is better value now than S?
    Strangely, why are all the comparisons in rest of the page below that comparisons between S and T (where T of course is much higher)? Why focus on T if A is the benchmark? And no comparisons mentioned to prices at A?

    Of course it all just falls apart!

    ...
    "You can be reassured that we will continue to run competitive promotions as we've always done. However as our regular prices will be lower it will mean that you can choose to buy the products you love whenever you want because you won't have to wait for a deal to get a good price."

    Hmmm. I don't agree that it will mean that at all! I'm not going for a regular price of Muller yoghurt of £3:eek: for example (down from £3.89:eek::eek:), just a 89p cut, why bother?, offer prices have been £1.94. In fact, not reassured at all (I'm difficult to reassure:D) as A's 'offer' price is £2 rather than £1.94, and if A is now the benchmark to set prices by...

    Another way for price increase to match A's prices I feel (being over-cynical as I am, probably justifiably:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:).
  • nerfdad
    nerfdad Posts: 13,795 Forumite
    Off topic but help needed from elite please-
    My children have 100% school attendance and yet a holiday in term time is not allowed otherwise I will be fined! Unfortunately this is the only time I could possibly afford to take them abroad.
    Please sign this petition to make the government look at the case again

    http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/59196

    Many thanks to all who sign!

    Play the system;) your on mse so I'm sure you can come up with a good excuse ;) remember never pay more:) if you have to pay tell them your not with the kids dad then you only have to pay half :rotfl:
  • Tinyshoes
    Tinyshoes Posts: 29,014 Forumite
    mimi1234 wrote: »
    Oh no, I bet you are missing all that extra snagging already aren't you? :(:(:(

    I won't miss getting caught out in my dressing gown though. :rotfl:
  • nerfdad
    nerfdad Posts: 13,795 Forumite
    Tinyshoes wrote: »
    I won't miss getting caught out in my dressing gown though. :rotfl:

    Builders having therapy this week:D:D
  • Hands up who's ready and waiting for Magic Mike :T:j

    (No storyline whatsoever in case people are considering actually paying attention to it.....but plenty of drawling opportunities!!!)
  • Tinyshoes
    Tinyshoes Posts: 29,014 Forumite
    nerfdad wrote: »
    Builders having therapy this week:D:D

    One of them it's the second time apparently he caught this bloke in the bath on a job. :p :rotfl:
  • bubbs
    bubbs Posts: 67,855 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Sealed pot challenge number 003 £350 for 2015, 2016 £400 Actual£345, £400 for 2017 Actual £500:T:T £770 for 2018 £1295 for 2019:j:j spc number 22 £1,457Stopped Smoking 22/01/15:D:D::dance::dance:- 5 st 1 1/2lb :dance::dance:
  • Savvybuyer
    Savvybuyer Posts: 22,332 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 28 September 2014 at 9:12PM
    From the same Guardian article
    http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/sep/25/sainsburys-asda-brand-match-tesco-price-war

    S "...said it would make discounts easier to understand by using round pound prices and clearer signage with less emphasis on percentages or fractions."

    :(:(The assumption, as ever an incorrect one, being that a change to a "round pound" price represents a "discount".

    I dislike it a lot when anywhere says they are making something "easier" to understand:(:(:( - usually it seems that is code for increasing a price from a previous 85p half price to a round pound price. Sorry that the public generally can't understand percentages and fractions and are functionally innumerate but instesd understand the figure £1 (though it sometimes or often represents a quite high price). It's perceived, wrongly, as a good price. Yet Poundland and places like that for example can have items on £1 but one of the supermarkets be lower than a pound on the same item or Poundland stocking a smaller size than the supermarkets do and thus no different price per unit, even though the £1 price in Poundland appears to be lower than the supermarket's price (for a bigger item). General public do not realise!:(

    Sains. have done a lot of research into price "perceptions" and are acting in their own best interests! Which, as with any supermarket whose aim is to make profits, are totally contrary to ours.

    :idea:Perhaps...stretching my cynicism even farther.. the less emphasis on the 'fractions' will be in order to steer people away from the good value half price offers and onto the expensive round pound products in the store instead! As I've suggested, if not mentioned, very recently everything in a store is there to try to direct you to the items the store really wants to sell and that make it more profit - the entire set-up and layout, the whole appearance of colours, lights, price labels, everything, the whole lot - so, perfectly, it would make sense to have more people buy more of the round pounds - that are priced marginally more expensive, everyday, than the same item on offer elsewhere and elsewhere than A - and to buy fewer of the loss-making half prices. Then you can say that the product is a good price all the time (even though it's not*) and you don't have to wait for a deal (which you do, IMO). Bingo!:rotfl: And everything in supermarket language once again appears to mean the opposite of what it says!:rotfl::rotfl: But fortunately Savvy is used to that, expects nothing less and would be utterly surprised if it were any different!:D

    *Of course "good" is subjective so they can say what they like.
  • bubbs
    bubbs Posts: 67,855 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Stash storage

    4 Tier Plastic Shelving £10.74 With FREE DELIVERY @CPC
    http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/4-tier-plastic-shelving-10-74-with-free-delivery-cpc-2011218
    Sealed pot challenge number 003 £350 for 2015, 2016 £400 Actual£345, £400 for 2017 Actual £500:T:T £770 for 2018 £1295 for 2019:j:j spc number 22 £1,457Stopped Smoking 22/01/15:D:D::dance::dance:- 5 st 1 1/2lb :dance::dance:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.