We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

What is £8ph in 2020 worth in 2014 £s?!

Assuming average inflation of 2.5% pa over 6 years (unreasonable?) it is worth 6.89.

Current minimum wage is 6.50.

So a real terms increase of 6% over 6 years - not nothing but hardly enough to make a real difference to people's lives, is this the best Labour can offer the low paid?

I gues sit works because those who can understand maths (and possibly also understand about pricing out of jobs) can see it is not really any sort of a promise and those who can't think it sounds really generous?

Perhaps the Tories should counter with a minimum weekly pension of £335 in 2050....
I think....
«1

Comments

  • Masomnia
    Masomnia Posts: 19,506 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I think over the long term, and certainly during good years, you'd expect wages to outpace inflation by about that.

    It's a non-announcement.
    “I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled.” - P.G. Wodehouse
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    michaels wrote: »
    So a real terms increase of 6% over 6 years - not nothing but hardly enough to make a real difference to people's lives, is this the best Labour can offer the low paid?

    Governments should stick to increasing personal tax allowances to improve the lot of the low paid. Rather than impose a cost burden on business. Not that I'm anti minimum wage concept. In an age where factory workers in China still work 70 hours a week and live in dormitories. Increasing the number of available low skilled jobs is still a priority.
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,249 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Governments should stick to increasing personal tax allowances to improve the lot of the low paid. Rather than impose a cost burden on business. Not that I'm anti minimum wage concept. In an age where factory workers in China still work 70 hours a week and live in dormitories. Increasing the number of available low skilled jobs is still a priority.

    Polling suggests that Labour's promise to reintroduce the 10% tax rate is more popular than the coalition's plans to increase the personal tax allowance even though the later is obviously (to those who grasp basic maths anyway) more beneficial....
    I think....
  • Masomnia
    Masomnia Posts: 19,506 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    michaels wrote: »
    Polling suggests that Labour's promise to reintroduce the 10% tax rate is more popular than the coalition's plans to increase the personal tax allowance even though the later is obviously (to those who grasp basic maths anyway) more beneficial....

    People are idiots.

    Very quick google. I found an ONS report that states that the median wage in real terms increased by 1.7% annually in the seven years to 2009. £8 could easily be a real terms cut if we saw an upturn in wages.
    “I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled.” - P.G. Wodehouse
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    michaels wrote: »
    Polling suggests that Labour's promise to reintroduce the 10% tax rate is more popular than the coalition's plans to increase the personal tax allowance even though the later is obviously (to those who grasp basic maths anyway) more beneficial....

    Same policy as Labour was touting some 18 months or so ago. Funded by a mansion tax if I recall. Sounds good to voters. Fails to deliver in all other aspects.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Masomnia wrote: »
    £8 could easily be a real terms cut if we saw an upturn in wages.

    With the attention on Scotland and domestic matters. Easy to forget that there's been plenty of poor economic data elsewhere recently. Events in Europe in particular are going to have a major bearing on the UK's recovery. Nor are the UK's budget issues resolved. A topic which has to be addressed by all the parties in the lead up to the GE next year.
  • Masomnia wrote: »
    People are idiots.

    Very quick google. I found an ONS report that states that the median wage in real terms increased by 1.7% annually in the seven years to 2009. £8 could easily be a real terms cut if we saw an upturn in wages.

    Anyone who votes for Ed is an idiot.

    I can't see how anyone with half a brain could vote for a moron like that.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Gangaweed wrote: »
    Anyone who votes for Ed is an idiot.

    I can't see how anyone with half a brain could vote for a moron like that.

    There's always a core that will vote irrespective of who is at the helm.
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    michaels wrote: »
    ....
    I gues sit works because those who can understand maths ...

    Studies consistently show that only 67% of people understand maths and percentages.

    Sheesh, I feel really sorry for the other 44% - boy have they got it tough.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    kabayiri wrote: »
    Studies consistently show that only 67% of people understand maths and percentages.

    Sheesh, I feel really sorry for the other 44% - boy have they got it tough.

    Like the referendum vote.

    55% voted no.
    45% voted yes.
    15% abstained.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.