We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
realistic rates of return
Options
Comments
-
So far this year... (after charges)
First State Asia Pacific leaders up 20.25%
First State Greater China up 24.14%
Neptune Russia & Greater Russia up 13.51%
Fidelity India Focus up 19.18%
Japan is down but what a good opportunity to consider a buy.This is not stellar stuff.Why bother taking the risk?
Double the performance of the FTSE100 would be one reason. Exposure to markets and industries which have little or no representation within the FTSE100 would be another. You seem to forget that Britannia doesn't rule the waves any more. There is a whole wide world out there which doesnt necessarily use London for any transactions.
Risk is balanced against the portfolio you hold. Put 100% into one of those funds vs 100% into FTSE100 and its higher risk. Have a small percentage in those funds in a spread of funds across the sectors and the risk reduces and can even be lower than the FTSE100.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
If you put your money into very risky emerging markets will you be happy at a 20% return when you can get a 27% return by investing in a well known UK equity income fund with a very long track record?
I can understand an advisor recommending a bit of this and a bit of that - after all it's back protection, you can't then be accused of failing to spot that wizard new market in Uzbekistan, the star of the year :rolleyes:Trying to keep it simple...0 -
Come on Ed, I understand the need for point scoring between you and dunstonh [tradition on these boards] but read what he said correctly:So far this year ...
That is if my guess that it's Invesco Perpetual High Income is correct.0 -
EdInvestor, I expect that the rates of return for the last year showing sector average first then best in sector will explain why people can usefully look outside the UK. UK Equity Income was ranked 12 out of 29 sectors on both sector average and best in sector performance.
Rank Sector Avg Best 1 Asia Pacific excluding Japan 46.9 81.8 2 Global Emerging Markets 42.6 64.3 3 European Smaller Companies 39.3 56.8 4 UK Smaller Companies 31 46.7 5 Europe excluding UK 28.4 44.1 6 Europe including UK 26.5 34 7 Asia Pacific including Japan 24.4 32.3 8 Technology & Telecommunications 23.9 45.6 9 UK All Companies 21.7 58.5 10 Global Growth 19.9 49.6 11 Active Managed 19.3 36.8 12 UK Equity Income 18.8 29.7 13 North American Smaller Companies 16.3 23.1 14 Balanced Managed 15.7 33.4 15 Specialist 15.6 65.4 16 Personal Pensions 13.9 52.5 17 UK Equity & Bond Income 13.4 22 18 North America 13.1 21.7 19 Protected/Guaranteed 9.2 14.7 20 Cautious Managed 9 17.2 21 UK Zeros 6.6 17.8 22 Money Market 3.5 4.8 23 UK Other Bond 3.3 8.1 24 UK Index Linked Gilts 0.9 3.2 25 UK Corporate Bond -1.5 2.7 26 UK Gilts -1.6 1.2 27 Global Bonds -1.8 12.9 28 Japan -2.1 8.8 29 Japanese Smaller Companies -12.1 19.6
I don't buy funds that I expect to be just average and I don't stick to just the UK. Nor should someone else who is interested in good long term growth and risk spreading. I currently hold 12 funds across 8 of those sectors.0 -
EdInvestor wrote: »They are not insignificant believe me. They double the cost of your investment - over 25 or 30 years this will eat up half of your returns :mad: http://www.pensionscommission.org.uk/publications/2004/annrep/chapters/ch6.pdf Click to page 14 for full details of these hidden charges.
I recommend that people do as you suggest and read the report, particularly the 15th and 17th pages, which estimate that the implicit charges were 0.5% and the total reduction in yield from both implicit and explicit charges below 1.1% in 2002 for pension funds.
The figures on the 19th page show that the real annual rates of return (after inflation) on UK equities were 5.5% since 1899 and 10.5 since 1977.
Total charges of 1.1% from a before charges return of 10.5% amount to about a 10.4% reduction in returns, not half of them. Even going with UK gilts those returned 6.9% and 1.1% from that is a 16% reduction, still not close to half.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards