📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

change of equity / transfer of ownership halifax

Options
2»

Comments

  • amnblog
    amnblog Posts: 12,732 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    They have checked you out, but not mentioned underwriting?

    Have they taken proof of ID, address, income?

    Have they run a credit score?
    I am a Mortgage Broker

    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Broker, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • amnblog wrote: »
    Because you were not speaking to the people who make it happen would be my guess.


    Sorry i'm not sure what you mean here ?

    I have been speaking to the mortgage advisor at Halifax Denton Branch who advise me of the fees/process involved etc
  • amnblog wrote: »
    They have checked you out, but not mentioned underwriting?

    Have they taken proof of ID, address, income?

    Have they run a credit score?

    Yes they have taken proof of ID , address and income and said that its a pass. I've don't remember him mentioning underwriting. He used the term transferring ownership. He did ask whether i would be interested in seeing if they was a cheaper mortgage option available but i didn't want to be locked into another 2/3/5 year variable/fixed mortgage again.
  • amnblog
    amnblog Posts: 12,732 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Sounds like you had better write the cheque out to the solicitors.
    I am a Mortgage Broker

    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Broker, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • amnblog wrote: »
    Sounds like you had better write the cheque out to the solicitors.


    stupid legal fees lol :cry::huh:_pale_:silenced:
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    stupid legal fees lol :cry::huh:_pale_:silenced:

    Unlikely to be the only costs you'll incur by the sounds of it. :eek:
  • Foxy-Stoat_3
    Foxy-Stoat_3 Posts: 2,980 Forumite
    stupid legal fees lol :cry::huh:_pale_:silenced:

    Unfortunately legal people are needed for transferring the legal ownership of small insignificant things like houses.

    If you buy a house legal fees are normally double what you have to pay, so its not that bad.

    Do you have a mortgage offer agreed?
    "Dream World" by The B Sharps....describes a lot of the posts in the Loans and Mortgage sections !!!
  • Goldiegirl
    Goldiegirl Posts: 8,806 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Rampant Recycler Hung up my suit!
    They have checked me out and i pass with flying colours so i'm told. it's just a little annoying that i have to get legal involved to complete the land registry form on my behalf and they want to charge £600 for the priviledge.

    I'm obviously going to have to pay the £600 but i was wondering if any one had experience of challenging this and was able to use a different company or do it themself :cool:

    I explained in my post on 11th why the Halifax require a solicitor that is on their panel to act in a Transfer of Equity.

    There's no point in challenging it, because they won't proceed if a panel solicitor hasn't been appointed, end of story.

    You'll need to trust me on this, as i processed Transfers of Equity for about 15 years when I worked for the Halifax, and no one was ever permitted to 'do it themselves'.

    A borrower could appoint a non panel solicitor to act on their behalf.

    But the Halifax would still require one of their panel solicitors to act for them, and you'd still have to pay for it.

    It's far easier to use one of the panel solicitors to act for you as well, otherwise you'd pay for two solicitors, and would risk confusion and delay as two solicitors liaise with each other.
    Early retired - 18th December 2014
    If your dreams don't scare you, they're not big enough
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.