We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
DWP Debt and law change
NuttyClaire
Posts: 2 Newbie
Hello,
Looking for some advice regarding a DWP debt I have. Sometime ago I was on income support and due to a genuine mistake on my part I did not tick the box that said I was receiving some child maintenance for my son (mutual agreement not through csa). It all came to light after I had a routine review and I went through the normal questions and said yes to the one asking if I was receiving maintenence etc. Next thing I know I was sent a letter saying I owed around £9000 due to not declaring the money for my son and over payment of income support. I disputed it at the time because I was certain I'd always told them but when they sent me copies of every form I'd filled in I see my mistake there in black and white.
That was around 2007 and I have been paying it back since then. I have recently discovered that in 2010 the law changed and child maintenence was disregarded from any benefit payments so my question is ..... Does my debt still stand because of the law change in 2010?
I hope that all made sense and any help would be gratefully received.
Claire
Looking for some advice regarding a DWP debt I have. Sometime ago I was on income support and due to a genuine mistake on my part I did not tick the box that said I was receiving some child maintenance for my son (mutual agreement not through csa). It all came to light after I had a routine review and I went through the normal questions and said yes to the one asking if I was receiving maintenence etc. Next thing I know I was sent a letter saying I owed around £9000 due to not declaring the money for my son and over payment of income support. I disputed it at the time because I was certain I'd always told them but when they sent me copies of every form I'd filled in I see my mistake there in black and white.
That was around 2007 and I have been paying it back since then. I have recently discovered that in 2010 the law changed and child maintenence was disregarded from any benefit payments so my question is ..... Does my debt still stand because of the law change in 2010?
I hope that all made sense and any help would be gratefully received.
Claire
0
Comments
-
Usually law changes do not apply retrospectively, so I think you may be out of luck.
Try asking on here, these guys know there stuff :
http://legalbeagles.info/I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Debt free wannabe, Credit file and ratings, and Bankruptcy and living with it boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.For free non-judgemental debt advice, contact either Stepchange, National Debtline, or CitizensAdviceBureaux.Link to SOA Calculator- https://www.stoozing.com/soa.php The "provit letter" is here-https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2607247/letter-when-you-know-nothing-about-about-the-debt-aka-prove-it-letter0 -
The law changed in 2010, meaning that after this point child support was not counted - when you were claiming it was counted, so unfortunately the change will not benefit you for overpayments in 2007 and before. If you were claiming benefits after 2010 you should have benefited from the change. Sorry not to have better news for you!
S0 -
I agree - it is one of the rules of statutory interpretation that in the absence of specific and explicit words to the contrary, legislation does not have retrospective effect.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
