We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Which fix is best?
Comments
-
homehunter wrote: »Frustrating isn't it? We are coming to the end of a 5 year fix at 5.69%. All the advice we took in 2009 said to expect rates to go up. They didn't. .
We were in the same position, we actually dumped our 5 year 5.99 % fix in favour of a 3.99% 5 year fix and paid the erc's. We kept the monthly payments at the same amount but reduced the term by 5 years. Just renewed at 3.49%.
I like longer term fixes, no nasty surprises or looking for new deals.0 -
If it is your first mortgage (same as us), I personally think 3 years is best to fix. 5 years are too long and not to have regrets as many who fixed for this periods in 2009 do now.
- You can use whatever money left if you have fixed for 5 years to make overpayments on 3 years.
- Remortgages are always cheaper than first time buyer.
- Besides in 3 years time your LTV will be higher, which means your remortgage will be even cheaper.0 -
If it is your first mortgage (same as us), I personally think 3 years is best to fix. 5 years are too long and not to have regrets as many who fixed for this periods in 2009 do now.
- You can use whatever money left if you have fixed for 5 years to make overpayments on 3 years.
- Remortgages are always cheaper than first time buyer.
- Besides in 3 years time your LTV will be higher, which means your remortgage will be even cheaper.
Sorry but I disagree with some of your points.
If someone knows that they are not going to move within the next 5 years, and wants a fix, then I would certainly consider the longer fix.
The issue about remortgages vs FTB is irrelevant as we are discussing remortgage in 3 years vs remortgage in 5 yrs.
In 3 years time the LTV will be lower (not higher) and there is no guarantee that it will have reduced sufficiently to make a different to interest rate bandings, particularly as you pay mostly interest at the start of a mortgage.
In 3 years' time interest rates will certainly be higher than they are now; if there is little difference between a 3 year and 5 year rate now then the 5 year fix would financially seem a decent option.0 -
Oh, and no arrangement fee, £250 cashback, they pay for valuation and a portion towards legal fees - we were very pleased with Santander (if you don't mind waiting AGES for approval).
didnt knew about legal fees. what % was that?[STRIKE]Deposit: 25000!!/15000[/STRIKE] Homeowner :j
quidco cashbacks- 1142.810
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards