We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Limitations Letter

Hi I am being contacted by an old debt which i believe to be statute barred. I have sent the limitations letter and requested evidence of contact and or payment in the past 6 years: The Solicitors acting for the creditors have advised payment has been paid in the last 4 years yet have failed to provide the evidence to support this. My initial letter was sent 28th April 14 and i have received a second letter from them demanding proof of earnings and out goings with which to ascertain a payment programme. Being as they have not supplied me with the evidence requested, how much time am i obliged to give them to provide the evidence? Do i acknowledge their second letter? Thanks for any advise you can offer. Claire

Comments

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.