We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Suggestions for controlling house price rises
Comments
-
TickersPlaysPop wrote: »If we allow property to increase in an attempt to discourage immigration it would be a very socially divisive policy.
I think immigration pushes property prices up so it should be self correcting.0 -
BBC News - European Commission urges UK to tax expensive homes and build more houses. more http://bbc.in/1m76dC5 #UKIP
also
The only way to fairness in housing is to tax property
Help to Buy and the other government schemes merely lock in place an unjust system which rewards those in power
Even in London there are more bedrooms than people: a greater supply of housing per head than there has ever been. But because inequality has been expanding even faster than extensions and conversions, most of this abundance of space is in the hands of the people who need it least. A well-aimed tax would help to match housing to need – and would doubtless prompt a major reassessment of how much new building is really required.
When an obvious answer is ignored or repudiated by almost everyone, you see that this is a problem which is not supposed to be solved. The government's measures – Help to Buy, less planning control, incentives for landlords – are not intended to accommodate those in greatest need. They accommodate the unjust system that keeps them there.0 -
The size of households has decreased - but you know that?
The only answer is to build more. Anything else is a short-term fix at best.
Presumably you are opposed to the Bedroom Tax, so what makes you think such a measure would work for private housing?
It's also a massive vote-loser for any party proposing it.0 -
also
The only way to fairness in housing is to tax property
Help to Buy and the other government schemes merely lock in place an unjust system which rewards those in power
Even in London there are more bedrooms than people: a greater supply of housing per head than there has ever been. But because inequality has been expanding even faster than extensions and conversions, most of this abundance of space is in the hands of the people who need it least. A well-aimed tax would help to match housing to need – and would doubtless prompt a major reassessment of how much new building is really required.
When an obvious answer is ignored or repudiated by almost everyone, you see that this is a problem which is not supposed to be solved. The government's measures – Help to Buy, less planning control, incentives for landlords – are not intended to accommodate those in greatest need. They accommodate the unjust system that keeps them there.
clearly the shortage of housing in London has nothing to do with the low property building rate or the increase in population
but then the Guardian did tell it's readers to vote for the LibDem at the last election so any inanity is possible0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards