We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
When is a 'new' car not new?
Comments
-
-
I recently purchased a year old car. It had 1 owner. If it had been advertised as 2 previous owners I wouldn't have looked at it because I'd have wondered what was wrong with it to be sold within the first year, and then again.
The price might not be affected much but the amount of buyers will drop significantly if you decide to sell early IMO. Over time this isn't such a big issue obviously.Pants0 -
OP, I'm sorry you think you have been hoodwinked on this, it is a recurring query on this and other motoring sites. You have obtained a brand new car at a handsome discount from list, the manufacturers, brokers, dealers and buyers have been doing it for years and it helps maintain the artificial manufacturers list price for less savvy buyers. Everyone in the chain benefits and the only downside of these brokered, ex-demo, managers or fleet cars is in the paperwork. Someone, somewhere is always the paperwork holder for a pre-determined time to pretend there has been a business reason for the new car not to be in the hands of a consumer straight away.
It's not a big issue, DVLA incompetencies have devalued the, "only one owner" as a major selling point, but if a savvy buyer or trade buyer buys it from you in the future, they will use it as a chipping tool.
Incidentally through the way DVLA has screwed up paperwork and plate changes I have a car outside that I know its history from new. Main dealer sold it to my Accountants Firm, he bought it from his own firm and I bought it from him for my Wife. Number of previous keepers? Seven!0 -
-
It does seem there were smoke and mirrors used by the broker so that it wasnt absolutely clear that they would be registering the car first.
I would be curious as to who the broker is, as it doesnt sound like one of the big players? They're usually straight up about that sort of thing.Realistically, i dont think the O/P has a pups chance of getting a full refund and it doesnt look like the broker has any intention of paying comp-pen-say-shun.If its not in your name, then its not your responsibility to display the tax disc?0 -
I recently purchased a year old car. It had 1 owner. If it had been advertised as 2 previous owners I wouldn't have looked at it because I'd have wondered what was wrong with it to be sold within the first year, and then again.
The price might not be affected much but the amount of buyers will drop significantly if you decide to sell early IMO. Over time this isn't such a big issue obviously.
Its a fair question to ask - although i cant see anyone advertising a year old car with a selling feature of "two owners", but its simply covered off with car was previously registered by the broker, or car was a pre-reg, etc. Clearly there is nothing there that would suggest a fault with the car.
I would say 25% of "new" cars sold these days are pre-reg / not-the-first-name-on-the-tax-book type sales, so its happening all the time - yet there is nothing in the trade guides that says a car with two owners / pre reg is worth less, so clearly no real impact in the real world.0 -
napoleon1769 wrote: »Unfortunately, I'm not prepared to name and shame at this stage. It wasn't a big player, but I did my research beforehand and this company got some glowing reviews on various online forums. I paid my deposit on my credit card in order to protect me if they ran off with the money.
You're right that the broker simply do not want to assist. They sent a very rude final response to me and won't respond to my emails or telephone calls. They are obviously aware of their own dodgy practices.
The car is taxed (as it is newly registered), but the DVLA have advised that it would be an offence to drive the car without displaying a tax disc. Any dispute of the registered keeper would be irrelevant in this case.
Personally, if it were me i would chalk it up to experience and continue to enjoy your new purchase.
You could spend months of hassle trying to get somewhere with this and there are no guarantees of success.
If you really really really want to push it, get valuations from several dealers of it being one owner or two owner now, and then submit a claim through the small claims court for the difference. But be prepared for them to weasel their way out of it if at all poss.0 -
The small print on that document [STRIKE]may[/STRIKE] WILL over ride the website small print. So long as they don't say they can supply a substitute etc you may have a case.
My bet would be they have a loophole for this clever con. You may also find the car is an import, intended to be sold somewhere like Cyprus.0 -
This could affect your insurance payout if you smashed it up. When I bought my car, I was told in the event of a write off I would receive a brand new replacement as I was first owner/keeper by hastings. If I was the 2nd keeper or once it reached a year old, I would receive market value. Suppose thats what GAP insurance is for.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.1K Spending & Discounts
- 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards