We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Capping mortgages

The BOE has hinted that it "could" cap mortgages at 4x income. maybe 5x income. It's a bit wooly.

Just throwing it up for debate. Will it make any difference?

Taking the national average household income of £36.3k before tax (IFS, 2013), this would mean, roughly, the optimum potential borrower could borrow £145,000.

The land registry shows that the current average house price is £169,000.

This suggests if the person on average income buys the average priced house, they will require a deposit of around 15% or £24,000.

Bearing in mind that £24,000 is nearly an entire years household income after taxes, this would seem difficult.

So how hard would such a cap hit the market, if at all? And therefore, how likely is it that the cap will actually be around 5x?
«13

Comments

  • wymondham
    wymondham Posts: 6,356 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Mortgage-free Glee!
    I think it's a good start. If most people can't physically get the funds to buy a house, then this has to have a good effect on house prices ... or it may create an underclass of only those cash rich can buy and all others can't?


    Still does not address the 'not enough houses' problem....
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If read the monthly CML reports. Borrowing for both new and existing customers averages consistantly around the 3.2x salary mark. So lenders aren't taking undue risk.
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    If read the monthly CML reports. Borrowing for both new and existing customers averages consistantly around the 3.2x salary mark. So lenders aren't taking undue risk.

    If this is the case, does this suggest a lot are simply priced out?

    Presumably these "priced out" will simply grow, as the amount of people already with property and equity taking on a new mortgage becomes a smaller and smaller pool of people?
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    As a set of numbers it makes sense, and a 15% deposit requirement cannot be too onerous.

    Of course, when you take into account the Kebabs, cans of Stella and numerous punts on a Betfair account they will probably end up with a mortgage offer which is for far less.
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • mayonnaise
    mayonnaise Posts: 3,690 Forumite
    I suppose this, (maybe in combination with end to HTB?) would help to squeeze out a large chunk of FTB's in favour of BTL-ers.
    Whether that's a good thing or not is subjective.
    Don't blame me, I voted Remain.
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    purch wrote: »
    As a set of numbers it makes sense, and a 15% deposit requirement cannot be too onerous.

    I'm not too sure that would be the case. To save nearly a whole years salary when also facing current living expenditure would seem quite a task.
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 19 May 2014 at 12:56PM
    mayonnaise wrote: »
    I suppose this, (maybe in combination with end to HTB?) would help to squeeze out a large chunk of FTB's in favour of BTL-ers.
    Whether that's a good thing or not is subjective.

    Can't seem them ending it.... reducing the cap possibly. Just can't see such a blow being delivered to the government a year before the election. HTB is one of their flagship policies. A lot of time has been spent promoting it, with even Cameron himself spending around 3 days so far walking round the country on building sites and sitting drinking tea in a new HTB home!

    Certainly if they ended it due to it being problematic, I'd fell truly sorry for those who bought into it considering they could have bought into a policy promoted price increase.
  • ruggedtoast
    ruggedtoast Posts: 9,819 Forumite
    Back in 2007 I honestly thought that things like this would have made some kind of difference. 7 years later with probably another 3 million people needing homes; I just dont think it will work.

    There either has to be a lot less population growth or a whole lot more housebuilding. Even if both of these things came into effect tomorrow it would still take years to have any real effect on housing affordability.

    Those sitting on deposits waiting for them to be worth more are going to have a very long wait indeed I am afraid.
  • IronWolf
    IronWolf Posts: 6,445 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I think its a good idea. In the current market I don't think it will have much impact, I cant imagine there are many loans given over 4x income. But it will stop crazy lending from returning in the long term.
    Faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
  • HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH Posts: 28,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Graham, how many times, the average income of all people is not the same thing as the average income of house buying people.

    The average mortgage multiple of actual FTB-s never crossed 3.5 times income even at peak in 2007, it's lower than that today.

    Capping at 5 times will have no effect.

    Only building millions more houses will make any difference…..
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.