We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Halifax April 2014 - 0.2% MoM + 8.5% YoY
Comments
-
I rest my case for a little "reminder".There is no way on earth that Interest Rates will ever get above 2% Base within 20 years.
As stated above, there is a generation who think that 0.5% IR's is normal .... and maybe it IS now!
I have seen 15% IR's and the suffering involved in that ... the fact is that money is, and will be for decades, extremely cheap.0 -
-
From a selfish point of view I would love 15% IR's ... I would sell all my properties (if I could at that point!) and sit on cash. I would do very nicely indeed without lifting a finger.
From the point of view of those who have just bought, indeed I have just helped my offspring to buy, it could be painful (obviously, I wouldn't allow it to hurt too much without removing the debt completely) .... but for others without a safety net it would be a disaster.
And that's why it will never happen - too many hopes, homes and futures tied to very low IR's.Bringing Happiness where there is Gloom!0 -
From a selfish point of view I would love 15% IR's ... I would sell all my properties (if I could at that point!) and sit on cash. I would do very nicely indeed without lifting a finger.
From the point of view of those who have just bought, indeed I have just helped my offspring to buy, it could be painful (obviously, I wouldn't allow it to hurt too much without removing the debt completely) .... but for others without a safety net it would be a disaster.
And that's why it will never happen - too many hopes, homes and futures tied to very low IR's.
With 15% IR I wouldn't expect cash would be a good strategy, inflation would be running wild at that point too.0 -
That's because he is heavily involved in 'Devonomics' :rotfl:
Maybe you or chucky could explain what it all really means then?
The average house as measured by Halifax has fallen in value around £800 in the month. Or £26 a day on average as I believe you are fond of such numbers.
Now, I understand that to be a fall in values over the month. Maybe you could explain where I went wrong.
Otherwise. Good.0 -
With the money they've printed, inflation will run wild at some stage.
IRs will be high again. It won't be their choice.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Maybe you or chucky could explain what it all really means then?
The average house as measured by Halifax has fallen in value around £800 in the month. Or £26 a day on average as I believe you are fond of such numbers.
Now, I understand that to be a fall in values over the month. Maybe you could explain where I went wrong.
Otherwise. Good.
Couple of fatties in our office who get irrationally excited about losing a pound at the weekly weight watchers meeting. I explain that the weekly weigh-in is just noise and as their trend is still towards increasing weight they'll likely be even fatter this time next year.
OK I didn't really say it out loud but if they could read my thoughts that's what they see.
If they took a single weekly loss and divided by 7 to demonstrate how much weight they'd lost each day I'd definitely mutter something under my breath.
EDIT: The monthly loss you're celebrating is only £348.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »
Now, I understand that to be a fall in values over the month. Maybe you could explain where I went wrong.
Common sense bypass?
Lets see where we are in 3 months (sounds familiar).
Round here people are paying whatever it takes. I said to you ages ago the London ripple would become a reality and you haughtily scoffed. I have clients across the nation saying prices are rocketing.0 -
Couple of fatties in our office who get irrationally excited about losing a pound at the weekly weight watchers meeting. I explain that the weekly weigh-in is just noise and as their trend is still towards increasing weight they'll likely be even fatter this time next year.
OK I didn't really say it out loud but if they could read my thoughts that's what they see.
If they took a single weekly loss and divided by 7 to demonstrate how much weight they'd lost each day I'd definitely mutter something under my breath.
What's this got to do with me not [apparently] understanding how it works?
Seems I'm told I don't understand how it works. When I therefore explain how it works you get the above suggesting you are "muttering something under your breath".
Appears the sole issue here is having a pop.....almost pointlessly.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards