We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Green Belt - what's it good for?

1111214161720

Comments

  • princeofpounds
    princeofpounds Posts: 10,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Green Belt

    asparagus-field-425x318.jpg

    Wimbledon Common

    wimbledon_common2_600x.jpg
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 7 May 2014 at 6:31PM
    e343848d862782570cc140de2c761d86b6cfc8f10cfc44bd21e63963dbf994b4._UY363_CR0,0,484,363_.


    event_120274292.jpeg


    Green belt


    I see your first photo is an Asparagus field is it in the green belt
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ukcarper wrote: »
    I agree there are parts of the green belt that could be used with only a small impact and I'm not against some development in the greenbelt. I was surprise when I looked at my local green belt map how much building was already in it.



    why are you surprised?

    on what basis?

    are the developments new or were they there before green belts were invented?

    do you think that the increase in population since 1948 would affect things in any way?
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    why are you surprised?

    on what basis?

    are the developments new or were they there before green belts were invented?

    do you think that the increase in population since 1948 would affect things in any way?



    I'm surprised that a complete village was green belt not just the surrounding land. It includes estates built in the 60s.
  • princeofpounds
    princeofpounds Posts: 10,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I see your first photo is an Asparagus field is it in the green belt

    Yes, it is.

    Of course it is fulfilling its strategic green belt role in preventing a national shortage of asparagus.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Yes, it is.

    Of course it is fulfilling its strategic green belt role in preventing a national shortage of asparagus.



    Personally I don't like asparagus but plenty of people do so not only is it stopping local towns merging into one it is providing another useful service.
  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    You can build a city of 0.5 million on an area of just 25km2 including all the infrastructure and businesses. In such a city the farthest point from the centre would be about two miles or half an hours walk with everyone else closer than that. It could be a car free or car lite city.

    Twenty such cities would be enough for 10 million people and take up just 500km2 which is only 0.2% of the land mass of the UK or 0.38% of the land mass of England. And even most of that would be green land eg gardens and parks

    London needs 10 of these boroughs on its greenbelt. The reast of the country needs the other 10
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    cells wrote: »
    You can build a city of 0.5 million on an area of just 25km2 including all the infrastructure and businesses. In such a city the farthest point from the centre would be about two miles or half an hours walk with everyone else closer than that. It could be a car free or car lite city.

    Twenty such cities would be enough for 10 million people and take up just 500km2 which is only 0.2% of the land mass of the UK or 0.38% of the land mass of England. And even most of that would be green land eg gardens and parks

    London needs 10 of these boroughs on its greenbelt. The reast of the country needs the other 10


    Crawley 45sq km population 100,000
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ukcarper wrote: »
    Crawley 45sq km population 100,000

    what do you want : higher density housing or lower density housing?
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    what do you want : higher density housing or lower density housing?



    Just pointing out that 25sq km will not accommodate 500 thousand people and all infrastructure.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.