We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
MMR -new rules

justjohn
Posts: 2,260 Forumite


Is MMR based solely on disposable income.
if applicant is SE and has 5-10k going into a savings account per annum then application is decided on that?.(obviously other bank accounts would be look at for consistency)
Are payslips/certified accounts no longer the be all and end all
if applicant is SE and has 5-10k going into a savings account per annum then application is decided on that?.(obviously other bank accounts would be look at for consistency)
Are payslips/certified accounts no longer the be all and end all
0
Comments
-
No. You will still be assessed on your net profit from your accounts or SA302s, usually an average of the last two years.
The change with MMR is about your outgoings. Things like student loans, childcare, school fees, ground rent & service charges will all form part of affordability calculations.
Some lenders are going totally anal and analysing every entry on your bank statements, while others are using Office Of National Statistics figures to set a benchmark for your household and only looking at bigger items, such as those mentioned earlier.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
so the new rules are just a secondary check for affordability?
with no benefit to the applicant?0 -
so the new rules are just a secondary check for affordability?
with no benefit to the applicant?
I think the point is to make sure that the applicant is not borrowing more than they can afford to repay and leaving themselves open to missed payments etc should interest rates rise.
Every lender is different but i know that Natwest have said that in terms of affordability not much has changed for them with the new rules, they use ONS figures anyway, they just look at bigger expenditure that is not considered the norm as mentioned above0 -
so the new rules are just a secondary check for affordability?
with no benefit to the applicant?
It's debatable whether that is, or should be, the role of a regulator...I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards