We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Accumulation vs Inclusive Accumulation
zenmaster
Posts: 3,151 Forumite
I'm attempting to pick some funds for a SIPP. What a steep learning curve!
I think I understand the difference between Income and Accumulation but what the hell is Inclusive Income and Inclusive Accumulation and which should I go for?
TIA.
I think I understand the difference between Income and Accumulation but what the hell is Inclusive Income and Inclusive Accumulation and which should I go for?
TIA.
0
Comments
-
I found the answer buried deep in the FAQs on the HL website.
If anyone else doesn't know, Inclusive means that it includes a charge for commission to the broker which, I understand is no longer the case.0 -
It is the case, but you should get it back via "loyalty bonuses". Some unbundled funds have loyalty bonuses too but much smaller. See http://www.hl.co.uk/funds/wealth-150/plus/fund-comparison-toolI found the answer buried deep in the FAQs on the HL website.
If anyone else doesn't know, Inclusive means that it includes a charge for commission to the broker which, I understand is no longer the case.0 -
ah yes, HL call it "inclusive", but the correct term is "dirty"
and they say "unbundled", when they should say "clean".0 -
I havent heard the phrase inclusive used anywhere. bundled, retail and dirty are most commonly used. However, unbundled and clean are the main two for "clean".I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
-
It's like this on HL -I havent heard the phrase inclusive used anywhere. bundled, retail and dirty are most commonly used. However, unbundled and clean are the main two for "clean".
I guessBlackRock Natural Resources Growth & Income (Inclusive Accumulation)
doesn't sound so appealing.BlackRock Natural Resources Growth & Income (Dirty)
As zagfles says, I do believe that HL refund the commission (do they have a choice? Rhetorical question!!!). I would have thought it simpler to just not offer this option.
Anyway, it begs another question arguably worthy of a separate thread.
On the application form it asks for a "full fund or share name". Now, the box is quite small, my handwriting is scrawly and some of the fund names are ridiculously long (see above). If I just put the ISIN would this be acceptable?
Thank you.0 -
Whilst it's colloquially useful to use dirty and clean I don't think it's practical to expect this to be quoted by the industry as it seems so perjorative, bundled and unbundled is probably the best were going to get.0
-
"BlackRock Natural Resources Growth & Income (Dirty)" sounds about right - it's mostly fossil fuels and miners 0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards